Seebeck generator from placing water heater next to freezer

AI Thread Summary
A thermoelectric generator placed between a water heater set at 130°F and a freezer at 5°F is unlikely to collect usable energy due to the laws of thermodynamics, which state that the energy required to maintain the temperature difference exceeds any energy gained. The insulation of both appliances further limits heat transfer, resulting in minimal energy capture potential. While suggestions for using a heat exchanger to transfer heat from the freezer to the water heater exist, the practicality and cost-effectiveness of such solutions are questioned. Heat recovery chillers are already available for larger applications, but their effectiveness in residential settings is doubtful. Overall, the concept of energy conservation in this scenario does not yield significant benefits.
DWT
Messages
20
Reaction score
4
Water heater is set at 130 degree f freezer is 5 degrees f.

Is it possible for a thermoelectric generator to collect energy from these placed side by side?

Would the extra energy used by the heater and freezer due to the presence of the generator cancel out and then some any energy that could be collected?
 
  • Like
Likes Hameed Qureshi
Science news on Phys.org
If I read your question correctly, the answer is:
There cannot be a perpetuum mobile (PMM) in our universe. (Reason: laws of thermodynamics)
 
I am not suggesting a perpetuum mobile, i am asking more about conservation of energy. Since one thing is allready hot the other cold couldn't we conserve some of that energy and give it back to grid?
 
  • Like
Likes Hameed Qureshi
Short answer is "no." A freezer pumps heat from the inside chamber and exhausts it externally in its refrigeration cycle. The outside of the freezer gets warm.

It would be better to have the watersupply going into a water heater jacket where the incoming water is cold, and put your peltier device inbetween the jacket and water tank.

The reality is, its not cost effective.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
DWT said:
I am not suggesting a perpetuum mobile, i am asking more about conservation of energy. Since one thing is allready hot the other cold couldn't we conserve some of that energy and give it back to grid?
The water heater and freezer are both insulated to prevent heat transfer. That's the opposite of what an energy harvesting device needs. So there really is almost no energy available to be captured and at an extremely low delta-T (because of the insulation), you get an extremely low efficiency.

Broader; the laws of thermodynamics do indeed forbid such a device from being useful, even if it isn't obvious how. The energy required to create your temperature difference must always be greater than the energy gained by harnessing it. In this case, it is particularly bad because most electric water heaters don't even use a heat pump (COP: 4:1), they use resistors (efficiency: 100%/COP: 1:1)
 
protonic_mass said:
Short answer is "no." A freezer pumps heat from the inside chamber and exhausts it externally in its refrigeration cycle. The outside of the freezer gets warm.

It would be better to have the watersupply going into a water heater jacket where the incoming water is cold, and put your peltier device inbetween the jacket and water tank.……

Or maybe just set up a heat exchanger between the two, so that heat from the compressed refrigerant fluid gets put into the cold water entering the tank? This would perform some of the work of heating the water and cooling the refrigerant, practically for free. Wouldn’t that reduce the amount of energy needed to do both jobs? Would probably work best when the water is in motion, so I don’t know how much of a savings it would be. Just a thought.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
LURCH said:
Or maybe just set up a heat exchanger between the two, so that heat from the compressed refrigerant fluid gets put into the cold water entering the tank? This would perform some of the work of heating the water and cooling the refrigerant, practically for free. Wouldn’t that reduce the amount of energy needed to do both jobs? Would probably work best when the water is in motion, so I don’t know how much of a savings it would be. Just a thought.
In fact, this product already exists: it's called a heat recovery chiller. It makes process hot and cold water at the same time, instead of rejecting the condenser heat to nowhere useful.

https://www.carrier.com/commercial/en/us/products/chillers-components/heat-recovery/

Really, it's just different in function from a normal water cooled chiller.

It isn't done on a scale as small as a residential refrigerator that I know of though.
 
Back
Top