"Seeing" particles with De Broglie visible wavelengths

andrewpareles
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Say an electron is fired with the same De Broglie wavelength as blue light.

If the electron were to reach your eye, would you see blue, or would something else happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electron would most likely be stopped by your cornea, as it is traveling relatively slowly, only about 1600 m/s by my calculations. Even if it did reach your cornea, your eyes are not designed to detect electrons or filter them by wavelength, so it could potentially activate any of your color receptors or do nothing at all. Astronauts in space have said that they occasionally see flashes of light even with their eyes closed as a result of charged particles passing through their bodies and interacting with their eyes. I assume they mean white light, as it wasn't described as being colorful.
 
I would like to know the validity of the following criticism of one of Zeilinger's latest papers https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07756 "violation of bell inequality with unentangled photons" The review is by Francis Villatoro, in Spanish, https://francis.naukas.com/2025/07/26/sin-entrelazamiento-no-se-pueden-incumplir-las-desigualdades-de-bell/ I will translate and summarize the criticism as follows: -It is true that a Bell inequality is violated, but not a CHSH inequality. The...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
This is not, strictly speaking, a discussion of interpretations per se. We often see discussions based on QM as it was understood during the early days and the famous Einstein-Bohr debates. The problem with this is that things in QM have advanced tremendously since then, and the 'weirdness' that puzzles those attempting to understand QM has changed. I recently came across a synopsis of these advances, allowing those interested in interpretational issues to understand the modern view...
Back
Top