Understanding Self-Induction: Calculating Current Growth Rate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rate of growth of current in a coil with a resistance of 15 ohms and self-induction of 0.6 Henry, connected to a 120-volt DC source. The maximum current is calculated as 8 Amperes, with 80% of that being 6.4 Amperes, leading to an electromotive force (e.m.f) of 96 volts. The initial calculation for the rate of change of current (dI/dt) yields 160 A/s, but a reference book provides a different approach, resulting in 40 A/s by considering the difference between the source voltage and the induced e.m.f. The discrepancy arises from the treatment of e.m.f as the difference in voltage (120-96) rather than the induced e.m.f alone. Understanding Lenz's Law and the separation of e.m.f from the battery and coil is crucial for accurate calculations.
sagda_m2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This question is about the self induction:

The resistance of a coil is 15 ohm, itself induction is 0.6 Henry, it is connected to a source of direct current which gives 120 volts. Calculate the rate of growth of the current at the moment when the current reaches 80 % of its maximum value.

My Answer:

First I calculated the maximum current:
I= V/R = 120/5 =8 Ampere

Therefore: the 80 % of the maximum current =6.4 A

Then the electromotive force will be:
V= I * R = 6.4 * 15 = 96 volt

And since: the induced e.m.f in the coil = -L * (dI/dt)

Therefore: 96 = 0.6 * (dI/dt)

Therefore: dI/dt = 96/0.6 = 160 A/s

But…..
I found the answer in my book as follows:

Since e.m.f = -L*(dI/dt)

Therefore: (120-96) = 0.6 * (dI/dt)

Therefore: dI/dt = 24/0.6 = 40 A/s

So, why did he substitute the e.m.f in the equation with the difference in volts (120-96)? Why didn't he substitute with the (96 volts)?


Thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the emf produced by the coil and the battery as separate and think about Lenz' Law.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top