Semisimple algebra (Killing form)

  • Thread starter Thread starter droblly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Form
droblly
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have started learning Lie algebra and I can't understand one example given in the notes.
Given:
[h_{\alpha},e_{\alpha}] = 2 e_{\alpha}
[h_{\alpha},f_{\alpha}] = -2 f_{\alpha}
[e_{\alpha},f_{\alpha}] = h_{\alpha}

and that
<br /> [x,y] = K(x,y) t_{\alpha} <br />
if \alpha is a root and x \in L_{\alpha}, y \in L_{-\alpha}
Now, the example is application of the theorem to A_2.
Generators are
h_{\alpha} = E_{11} -E_{22}
h_{\beta} = E_{22} -E_{33}
e_{\alpha} = E_{12}
e_{\beta} = E_{23}
e_{-\alpha} = E_{21}
e_{-\beta} = E_{32}
and Postive roots are {\alpha, \beta, \alpha+\beta}.

I am meant to check that
1.\alpha(h_{\alpha}) = \beta(h_{\beta}) =2
2.\alpha(h_{\beta}) = \beta(h_{\alpha}) =-1

I can't do part (2). Part (1) seems simple:
\alpha(h_{\alpha}) = K(t_{\alpha},h_{\alpha} )= K(t_{\alpha},2\frac{t_{\alpha}}{K(t_{\alpha},t_{\alpha})}) = 2
My problem is with finding t_{\alpha} and t_{\beta} to calculate K(t_{\alpha},t_{\alpha}). How would one go about doing it?
Because
\alpha(h_{\beta}) = K(t_{\alpha},h_{\beta} )= K(t_{\alpha},2\frac{t_{\beta}}{K(t_{\beta},t_{\beta})}) = \frac{2}{K(t_{\beta},t_{\beta})} K(t_{\alpha},t_{\beta})
Thanks.

EDIT: I hope I had posted in the right thread. Should I have posted this in HW help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have got it. It's just calculating the Cartan integers from the basis.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top