Separation of variables: Context of decelerating charged particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of rewriting acceleration in terms of dv/dt for a decelerating charged particle, which initially proved unsuccessful. The user realizes that the gamma factor is a function of velocity, complicating the integration process. A suggestion is made to multiply the equation by v, which clarifies the approach and aligns with the context of the problem. The user expresses gratitude for the insight and plans to share their progress for further validation. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of integrating motion equations in relativistic contexts.
CricK0es
Messages
54
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
I have attached an image of my problem. I realise that I need to use separation of variables to go from my LHS to my RHS; however, I’m unable to derive my RHS
Relevant Equations
*Attached in photo*
Attempted rewriting acceleration, a, in terms of dv/dt and then separating variables to integrate. This didn’t work...

So then I remembered that my gamma factor is also a function of v (!), but then I think I would be required to play around with integration by parts, which seems overly complicated.

Any help would be appreciated as I’m sure it’s straightforward but I’m really missing something here! Thank you
 

Attachments

  • 1409C977-A824-4B95-ABAC-0A4A5362BF42.jpeg
    1409C977-A824-4B95-ABAC-0A4A5362BF42.jpeg
    40.1 KB · Views: 250
Physics news on Phys.org
The dependent variable is v^2. (That is the only context in which \dots\,dt = \dots\,dv^2 makes sense.) Therefore try multiplying <br /> -\frac{m\gamma^3}{\alpha} \frac{dv}{dt} = v by v.
 
That’s perfect! I’ve never come across something where I’ve had to do it in that manner which is strange... But that makes a lot of sense. Thank you very much! I’ll post what I’ve done just to make sure I’ve got the right idea
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    36.5 KB · Views: 262
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top