Series expansion of logarithmic function ln(cosx)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the first three non-zero terms of the logarithmic function ln(cos(x)). Participants are exploring the series expansion of this function and the methods to derive it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the power series of the logarithmic function and the Taylor series expansion of cos(x). There are attempts to manipulate the expression for cos(x) and questions about the validity of these manipulations. Some participants suggest checking approximations with specific values.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the correctness of their approaches and seeking clarification on the differentiation of ln(cos(x)). Some guidance has been offered regarding alternative methods, such as integrating series expansions and considering derivatives.

Contextual Notes

There is a recurring theme of uncertainty regarding the manipulation of the cos(x) function and its implications for the series expansion. Participants are also considering the implications of using derivatives and Taylor series in their calculations.

seboastien
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A question asks me to find the first three non-zero terms of ln(cosx)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I wrote cos x as 1+(1-cos x), used the power series of ln function, expanded cosx and simplified, here is my answer: 1/2x^2 - 1/6x^4 + 1/16x^6

Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
seboastien said:
[A question asks me to find the first three non-zero terms of ln(cosx)

I wrote cos x as 1+(1-cos x), used the power series of ln function, expanded cosx and simplified, here is my answer: 1/2x^2 - 1/6x^4 + 1/16x^6

Is that right?

You can easily check for yourself. Try some suitable data, and use your calculator. Say, x=0.7

ln(cos(0.7)) = -0.282

How close is your approximation to this, for x=0.7 ?
 
okay, so It's wrong... where exactly have I messed up then?
 
They're being cute here. What is ln(cos x) the integral of? (If you don't recall, differentiate this function.) What is the series expansion of that function? Now integrate that term-by-term.
 
thanks, I'm not entirely certain, but is the differential -tanx?
 
seboastien said:

Homework Statement


A question asks me to find the first three non-zero terms of ln(cosx)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I wrote cos x as 1+(1-cos x), used the power series of ln function, expanded cosx and simplified, here is my answer: 1/2x^2 - 1/6x^4 + 1/16x^6

Is that right?

If all you want are a few terms, the easiest method is to expand ln(1-z) in powers of z, then substitute the first few terms of 1-cos(x) in place of z, that is, to use z = x^2/2 - x^4/4! + x^6/6! - ... . As to where you messed up: do you *really* think that cos(x) = 1 + (1 - cos(x))?

RGV
 
seboastien said:
thanks, I'm not entirely certain, but is the differential -tanx?

It is: you have either worked out its series expansion in your course, or you can get the first few terms yourself.
 
seboastien said:

Homework Statement


A question asks me to find the first three non-zero terms of ln(cosx)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I wrote cos x as 1+(1-cos x), used the power series of ln function, expanded cosx and simplified, here is my answer: 1/2x^2 - 1/6x^4 + 1/16x^6

Is that right?

What's wrong with just brute-force calculation of the first six derivatives of that function at zero, then form the Taylor series at zero? Think it would have been easier than your persuit otherwise.
 
The solution suggested by dynamicsolo seems easy enough to me.
 
  • #10
jackmell said:
What's wrong with just brute-force calculation of the first six derivatives of that function at zero, then form the Taylor series at zero?

There's nothing wrong with the direct approach. However, if a function can be recognized as being related to another one through algebraic manipulation, differentiation, or integration, you could save yourself a lot of work (sometimes work you already did to get the other Taylor/Maclaurin series).

And you get a bonus: the radius of convergence of a power series is not altered by differentiation or integration (and can be re-evaluated easily in the case of algebraic manipulation)!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K