Series Representation for Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the Taylor series for the function f(x) = 1 / (1-x²)² around x = 0. The initial approach involves differentiating g(x) = 1 / (1-x²) to obtain g'(x), leading to a series representation. The confusion arises regarding the presence of an x factor in the series representation of f(x), which is attributed to the application of the chain rule during differentiation. It is clarified that the correct differentiation includes this factor, which was overlooked in the initial attempt. Understanding the differentiation process and the chain rule is essential for accurately deriving the series representation.
KDawgAtsu
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Fin the Taylor series about x = 0 for:
f(x) = 1 / (1-x2)2


Homework Equations


g(x) = 1 / (1-x2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Differentiating g(x), the series representation of g'(x) is Ʃn(x2)n-1
Since f(x) = g'(x)/2x
f(x) = Ʃ(n/2)x2n-1
I'm pretty sure that's right, but what I don't get is that the solution for this problem is also written as Ʃn(x2)n-1, which is just g'(x).

What am I misunderstanding here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KDawgAtsu said:

Homework Statement


Fin the Taylor series about x = 0 for:
f(x) = 1 / (1-x2)2


Homework Equations


g(x) = 1 / (1-x2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Differentiating g(x), the series representation of g'(x) is Ʃn(x2)n-1
Since f(x) = g'(x)/2x
f(x) = Ʃ(n/2)x2n-1
I'm pretty sure that's right, but what I don't get is that the solution for this problem is also written as Ʃn(x2)n-1, which is just g'(x).

What am I misunderstanding here?
The Taylor series about x = 0 for g(x) = 1 / (1-x2) is: \displaystyle g(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(x^2)^n=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(x^{2n})\,, where x0=1 .

Differentiating term by term gives: \displaystyle g'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}2n(x^{2n-1})=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}2(n+1)x(x^{2n})\,,\text{ or equivalently }\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{2n}{x}(x^2)^n

Dividing by 2x gives: \displaystyle f(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n(x^2)^{n-1}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+1)(x^{2})^n\,.

They're all somewhat different.
 
\displaystyle g'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}2n(x^{2n-1})=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}2(n+1)x(x^{2n})\,,\text{ or equivalently }\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{2n}{x}(x^2)^n



Where did the x in front of the x^2n come from? I know you just shifted n=1 to n = 0, but I can't see where the x comes from?
 
KDawgAtsu said:
\displaystyle g'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}2n(x^{2n-1})=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}2(n+1)x(x^{2n})\,,\text{ or equivalently }\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{2n}{x}(x^2)^n

Where did the x in front of the x^2n come from? I know you just shifted n=1 to n = 0, but I can't see where the x comes from?

\displaystyle g'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}2n(x^{2n-1}) =\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}2(n+1)(x^{2n+1})=\sum_{n=0}^{ \infty}2(n+1)(x\cdot x^{2n})

Change n to n+1 so 2n - 1 becomes 2(n+1)-1 = 2n + 2 - 1 = 2n+1 .
 
KDawgAtsu said:
Differentiating g(x), the series representation of g'(x) is Ʃn(x2)n-1
If you were wondering why your attempt didn't work out, it's because you forgot to use the chain rule when you differentiated (x2)n. That's where the factor of 2x went missing in your calculation.
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top