Series Solution for O.D.E (Frobenius method?)

JacobHempel
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(For Physics 306: Theoretical methods of Physics... Text book: Mathematical Tools for Physics (really good!)...
Assumption: 300 level class = considerably junior level class)

-- Find a series solution about x=0 for y''+ysec(x) = 0, at least to a few terms.

(Ans: a_{0}[1-(1/2)x^{2}+0x^{4}+1/720x^{6}+...]+a_{1}[x-(1/6)x^{3}-(1/60)x^{5}+...]


Homework Equations



Frobenius Solution: Supposing there is a singularity point at x=x0, a possible solution is given by the power series, that is

Ʃ(from k=0 to inf) a_{k}x^{k+s}


The Attempt at a Solution



There is a singularity point not at x=0, but at x= npi/2. The problem specifies, though, to try finding a power series solution about x=0.

Let x(t) = Ʃ a_{k}x^{k+s}

Using this, plug it into the equation to obtain

Ʃ a_{k}x^{k+s-2} (k+s)(k+s-1) +Ʃ a_{k}x^{k+s} = 0

after that I matched the terms up by pushing the first summation up by two indicese. To do this, I wrote out two terms, then shifted the k values by +2.

a_{0}(s)(s-1)x^{s-2}+a_{1}(1+s)(s)x^{s-1}+Ʃ a_{k+2}x^{k+s} (k+s+2)(k+s+1) +Ʃ a_{k}x^{k+s} = 0

This is where I stopped. I'm unsure as to what to do next. You match up the terms in a regular Forbenius method, but this time it has a cos(x) in the second term, which is what makes this problem strange to me.

I think the next step is to find s, then just write out a few terms of both the series.

Also sorry about the mess regarding the equations. I got rid of all the sigma indices, so when you see a sigma, it is always from k=0 to k=∞.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Expand the secant function into a power series.
 
Since there's no singularity at x=0, you can use a plain old power series and avoid trying to find s from an indicial equation.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top