MHB Set Planck's constant equal to 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacobi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Set
AI Thread Summary
If Planck's constant were set to 1 J s, the universe would experience a dramatic increase in energy, with photon energy rising by 34 orders of magnitude, potentially leading to catastrophic consequences for matter. This change would likely result in rapid ionization of atoms, causing bodies to explode due to excessive energy absorption by electrons. Additionally, fundamental quantum phenomena would shift, making wave-particle duality a common occurrence rather than an exception. The discussion highlights the implications of such a hypothetical scenario on both physical laws and everyday life. Overall, the concept serves as a thought-provoking exploration of the nature of the universe and quantum mechanics.
jacobi1
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I have an interesting 'What If' question. I understand that it was originally meant to be in jest, but I am interested to know what would happen. Here is the original joke: "There was a discussion in the math and physics departments of a university. It was about whether to allow calculators on the exams. After heated debate, the physics department decided in favor of allowing calculators because their 3 hour exam had one question: 'Describe the universe, if Planck's constant were equal to 1.'"
If Planck's constant, instead of being $$6.63 \times 10^{-34}$$ J s, were 1 J s, how would the universe be different?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, one consequence is that there would be considerably more energy in the universe. The energy of a photon is given by $E=h \nu$, and so if $h$ is larger by 34 orders of magnitude, then the energy of the universe due to the presence of light would be 34 orders of magnitude greater. In other words, we would probably all burn up... unless, of course, our bodies were now (also due to the revised Planck constant) capable of handling that kind of energy without exploding. That is, unless the electromagnetic force were to increase by a similar amount, the absorption of a single photon would GREATLY increase the energy of an electron. That electron would then almost certainly break away from its nucleus. Imagine that happening en masse, and you see that your body would ionize very quickly. It would become highly positively charged, at which point you would explode.
 
Consider also that most equations about the quantum "world" are based on the fact that h is so small. If h were large then most quantum events would be the norm. So, for example, wave-particle duality would be common.

One of my professors made a joke that we would get an A in class if we could quantum tunnel into the final exam. If h = 1 Js you could bounce back and forth in the hallway and actually do it.

-Dan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jacobi said:
I have an interesting 'What If' question. I understand that it was originally meant to be in jest, but I am interested to know what would happen. Here is the original joke: "There was a discussion in the math and physics departments of a university. It was about whether to allow calculators on the exams. After heated debate, the physics department decided in favor of allowing calculators because their 3 hour exam had one question: 'Describe the universe, if Planck's constant were equal to 1.'"
If Planck's constant, instead of being $$6.63 \times 10^{-34}$$ J s, were 1 J s, how would the universe be different?

In the usual MKS metric system is $\displaystyle h= 6.63\ 10^{- 34} \frac {k\ m^{2}}{s}$. In principle You can use a 'quantum metric system' $Q_{m} Q_{k} Q_{s}$ where is $\displaystyle h= 1\ \frac{Q_{k}\ Q_{m}^{2}}{Q_{s}}$ and in this case it would be...

$\displaystyle \frac{Q_{k}\ Q_{m}^{2}}{Q_{s}} = 6.63\ 10^{- 34} \frac {k\ m^{2}}{s}$

... and I don't know if such a metric system is very comfortable in our quotidian life (Wasntme)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
267
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top