Set Theory, Functions. Injective/Surjective

ktheo
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Give f:A→A and g:A→A where f is surjective, g is injective, but f*g is neither surjective nor injecive

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know why I can't really think of two... I assume it's easiest to do one in ℝ, but when it comes to producing surjective-non-injective functions in general I tend to do them in Z since I find it easiest. I was thinking to do something involving e^x but I'm not sure. How should I approach this? Should I just think of functions I know are neither onto or one-to-one and work with products to find something?

Homework Statement



Assume that f:A→B and g:C→D are bijections. Prove that f^-1 x g^-1 is the two sided inverse of f x g (and in particular, that f x g is a bijection as well).

The Attempt at a Solution



I was wondering if someone could direct me to a similar proof or point me in the direction of some definitions that can help me here. I don't even know how to structure this into a proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top