The discussion revolves around the influence of sheet size on the simulation results when using lumped RLC components in HFSS. Participants explore how to appropriately set the sheet size and its implications for resistance, impedance matching, and overall simulation accuracy.
Participants express differing views on the impact of sheet size on simulation results, with some questioning its significance while others assert that it is crucial. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to setting the sheet size for lumped RLC components.
There are limitations regarding assumptions about the relationship between component size and simulation accuracy, as well as the dependence on specific definitions of resistance and impedance matching in the context of HFSS.
Yes, I set lumped RLC on 2D sheet in HFSS. And when its size changes, the result changes too. So I want to know how can I set a resistor/inductor/capacitor in HFSS without the influence of sheet size.Baluncore said:I do not use Ansys HFSS, but I would question the 2D? size of the Lumped RLC in wavelengths.
If you were using Lumped RLC to define a resistance, then size and the resultant resistance would change the termination and impedance matching.
I do not believe you can. Where the lump has properties specified per unit area, the component value will be dependent on the area. You will need to define the component shape and size as the area of the physical component to be used later in manufacture, and then give it the appropriate properties to get the value required.Melon said:So I want to know how can I set a resistor/inductor/capacitor in HFSS without the influence of sheet size.