Setting the trace of a tensor equal to zero

EsmeeDijk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A tensor t has the following components in a given orthonormal basis of R3

tij(x) = a(x2)xixj + b(x2) \deltaij x2 + c(x2) \epsilonijk xk (1)​
where the indices i,j,k = 1, 2, 3.
We use the Einstein summation convention. We will only consider orthogonal transformations on R3; therefore we will not make a distinction between upper and lower indices.
a,b,c are real functions of x2 := xixi, i.e. a = a(x2) depends on xi through the rotationally-symmetric combination xixi only.
The trace of the tensor t is defined as:
Tr(t) = tii (2)​

1. Calculate the trace (2) and set it to zero, i.e. find a constraint among the functions a,b,c such that Tr(t) = 0 for all x.

Homework Equations


We only need to use equation (1) and (2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the indices go from 1 to 3 we have to do t11 + t22 + t33 = 0
So the index i has to be equal to j. We get:
a(x2)x1x1 + b(x2)x2 + a(x2)x2x2 + b(x2)x2 + a(x2)x3x3 + b(x2)x2
The kronecker delta after the b is going to be one in every case so we can leave it out. The epsilon tensor in the part with c will be zero because we won't be able to get 3 different numbers, making the entire part with c 0.
We can now simplify to :
x2(a(x1)2 + a(x2)2 + a(x3)2 + 3b(x2)) = 0
So either x2 = 0
or (a(x1)2 + a(x2)2 + a(x3)2 + 3b(x2) = 0

So x = 0 or (a(x1)2 + a(x2)2 + a(x3)2 = -3b(x2)

Now my question is, is it the case that x1, x2 and x3 will they become just a normal x together?
such that we will have ax2 = -3bx2
a = -3b

 
Physics news on Phys.org
EsmeeDijk said:
x2 := xixi
This should already contain the answer to your question.
 
Contract your tensor equation with \delta_{ij} and set it equal to zero.
\mbox{Tr}(T) = \delta_{ij}T_{ij} = 0, \ \Rightarrow \ a = - 3b.
So
T_{ij} = -3b X_{i}X_{j} + b X^{2} \delta_{ij} + c \ \epsilon_{ijk} X_{k},
with b and c are arbitrary functions of the invariant X^{2}.
 
  • Like
Likes EsmeeDijk
Never mind, others already reacted while I was composing my post.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top