Setting up a centrifugal force question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the trajectory of a marble positioned in a rotating merry-go-round setup. The marble, initially at rest, is affected by forces including the normal force, fictitious centrifugal force, and Coriolis force due to the rotation. The challenge lies in determining the magnitude of these forces, which is not constant as the marble's radial displacement changes. A rotating frame of reference is essential for solving the problem, requiring a detailed calculus approach to derive the forces' components. Ultimately, understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately predicting the marble's motion.
rn433
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have a merry-go-round of radius 10 meters. There's a thin glass tube with cross-sectional density d going radially from the center of the merry-go-round to the edge. In the glass tube one meter away from the center, there's a marble of mass m. The merry-go-round completes one counter-clockwise rotation every 2pi seconds, and the glass tube is frictionless. At time t, the marble is at rest. I want to find the trajectory of the marble.

I'm taking the center of the merry-go-round to be at the origin and the marble's initial position to be at (0, 1); obviously its initial velocity is 0. Since the tube rotates counter-clockwise every 2pi seconds, I can define the marble's position at t as <r(t)cos(t), r(t)sin(t)>. What I'm having trouble with is finding the force acting on the marble. I know the normal force on the marble from the glass tube is in the direction <-sin(t), cos(t)>, perpendicular to the tube. However, I don't know how to determine its magnitude. I initially assumed it was constant, but this leads to an incorrect answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not constant as the radial displacement of the marble is constantly changing. You have a long exercise in calculus ahead of you, since you can only tell what the tangential and radial components of the force are, and you'll have to work your way up from there to get a function of \theta (r)

I'm pretty sure you can't solve this problem without using the rotating frame of reference, which would mean you have to refer to both the fictitious centrifugal force (Directed radially outwards) and the fictitious Coriolis force (Directed tangentially in the direction of the spin) as well as the real normal force (Directed tangentially against the direction of the spin).
 
Last edited:
RoyalCat said:
It is not constant as the radial displacement of the marble is constantly changing. You have a long exercise in calculus ahead of you, since you can only tell what the tangential and radial components of the force are, and you'll have to work your way up from there to get a function of \theta (r)

I'm pretty sure you can't solve this problem without using the rotating frame of reference, which would mean you have to refer to both the fictitious centrifugal force (Directed radially outwards) and the fictitious Coriolis force (Directed tangentially in the direction of the spin) as well as the real normal force (Directed tangentially against the direction of the spin).

How could I do this, though? I don't know how to determine the magnitude of those forces, either. :(
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top