Shielding at power frequency using femlab

AI Thread Summary
Shielding at power frequency using FEMLAB reveals that inclined reinforcement bars at 45 degrees provide better shielding efficiency than those at 90 degrees, possibly due to simulation quirks. The discussion highlights that typical shielding applications for rooms focus on electromagnetic interference (EMI) and radio frequency (RF) testing, usually in the range of hundreds of kHz to several GHz, rather than the lower power frequency of 50-60Hz. Full shielded rooms are preferred for effective shielding, requiring conductive gasketing on all openings. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the specific frequency requirements for effective shielding design. Overall, the choice of reinforcement bars versus full shielding depends on the intended application and frequency range.
sanshyme
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am doing shielding at power frequency using femlab. i have done 2D modeling on a room using reinforcement bars instead of a full shield and i wonder why is the bar inclined at 45 degrees will give a better shielding effeciency than at 90 degree?

in the real world, when do we use multiple reinforcement bars instead of a full shield in a room?

thanks
serene
 

Attachments

  • mesh.jpg
    mesh.jpg
    34.2 KB · Views: 502
Engineering news on Phys.org
Must be some quirk of the simulation program. Does it let you plot shielding effectiveness as a function of the radiation's angle? It sounds like your shielding simulation for "power frequency" is for 50-60Hz, right? That's not typically what I've seen shielded rooms used for. The shielded rooms and anechoic chambers that I've been in are for EMI and other RF testing work. The frequency range of interest where the room has to have very good shielding integrity is typically from a few 100kHz up through a few GHz. You only get that with a full shield room, including conductive gasketing on all openings like doors and cable feed-through ports.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top