Shift Equlibrium Concentrations Curves w/o Adding Stress

AI Thread Summary
Altering equilibrium concentrations without adding stress to a system is challenging, as any change in temperature, pressure, or concentration is considered a form of stress. Increasing pressure favors the side with fewer moles of gas, while decreasing pressure favors the side with more moles. Reducing volume increases pressure, thus applying stress and shifting equilibrium. The discussion emphasizes that any method to change equilibrium concentrations inherently involves some form of stress. Therefore, achieving this shift without stress is not feasible.
tsaitea
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I have been wondering if its possible to alter equilibrium concentrations without adding stress to the system?

Thanks,


Larry
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please elaborate.
 
It depends on what you call 'stress'.

For everything that increases stress you can also do the opposite, and the reaction will shift to the opposite side as well. For example:

If you increase the pressure (add stress?) of a reaction, it will favor the side with fewer moles of gas. If you would do the opposite, decrease the pressure (reduce stress?) of a reaction, it will favor the side with the most moles of gas.
 
The definition of stress (at least in my case) is a change in temperature, pressure or concentration in the system. For concentration we are talking about adding concentration to the system as a stress.

I was thinking maybe we can reduce the volume to shift the equilibrium concentrations downwards.
 
tsaitea said:
The definition of stress (at least in my case) is a change in temperature, pressure or concentration in the system. For concentration we are talking about adding concentration to the system as a stress.

I was thinking maybe we can reduce the volume to shift the equilibrium concentrations downwards.

You can reduce the volume to shift the equilibrium, if you reduce the volume you increase the pressure so that favors the side with fewer moles of gas.
 
How are you going to reduce a volume without applying a pressure (stress) to the system?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top