SHM and why does the frequency not decrease?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the frequency of a damped harmonic oscillator, specifically why it remains constant despite energy loss and decreasing amplitude. Participants clarify that for a harmonic oscillator, frequency is independent of amplitude, meaning it does not decrease even as energy is lost to damping. The decrease in positive peaks is attributed to damping effects, although the exact reason for this selective decrease is not fully explained. The conversation highlights the need for further understanding of the equations governing these phenomena. Overall, the key takeaway is that frequency remains constant in a damped harmonic oscillator, despite the reduction in amplitude.
Dima Petrukhin
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello, I don't get it why does the frequency not decrease? As this i assume is damping and frequency must change.
And why do only positive peaks decrease?2 Not sure about equations needed.

3.I thought that as it is damped, Energy is lost as heat. Thus speed decreases, therefore, it takes a longer time to complete an oscillation.Thus, frequency decreases, however, the mark scheme says that it is constant
The part about decreasing peaks is due to damping(I assume) but I do not have a clue why only positive peaks decrease.

Please help, I am very confused. Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-03-24 at 23.43.48.png
    Screen Shot 2018-03-24 at 23.43.48.png
    39.7 KB · Views: 523
  • Screen Shot 2018-03-24 at 23.43.56.png
    Screen Shot 2018-03-24 at 23.43.56.png
    5 KB · Views: 503
  • Screen Shot 2018-03-24 at 23.53.20.png
    Screen Shot 2018-03-24 at 23.53.20.png
    17 KB · Views: 495
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would the frequency decrease? For a harmonic oscillator frequency is independent of amplitude.
 
Orodruin said:
Why would the frequency decrease? For a harmonic oscillator frequency is independent of amplitude.
thanks for your reply.
can you please help me with the 2 bit? why only +ve peaks decrease?
 
Dima Petrukhin said:
... only +ve peaks decrease?
Where are you getting this?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top