Minimum r/R ratio for SHM when a hoop with mass rotates in a semicircular trough

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio Shm
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
55 replies · 12K views
The angles are related as (R-r)θ =αr .Arent they ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tanya Sharma said:
The angles are related as (R-r)θ =αr .Arent they ?

What do you call alpha?

ehild
 
α is the angle through which the object has rotated about its axis
θ is the angle through which the CM has rotated about the centre
 
Tanya Sharma said:
The angles are related as (R-r)θ =αr .Arent they ?

That is not right. The CM moves along a shorter arc as the common point between the cylinder and ball moves.

ehild
 
ehild said:
That is not right. The CM moves along a shorter arc as the common point between the cylinder and ball moves.

ehild

Yes... you are right...the equation i have written says the same
distance moved by CM =(R-r)θ
distance moved by point on the hoop =αr

I am assuming the hoop rolls without slipping ...
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Yes... you are right...the equation i have written says the same
distance moved by CM =(R-r)θ
distance moved by point on the hoop =αr

I am assuming the hoop rolls without slipping ...

Yes, it is rolling without slipping.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Yes :)

ehild

Continuing from my previous equation:

[tex]U=2mgR(1-\cos \theta)+2mgr\cos \theta+mgr\cos((\frac{R}{r}-1)\theta)[/tex]
If I put θ=0, I get U=3mgr which verifies that the equation is correct.

What should be my next step?
 
What happens if theta changes?

What is the characteristics of the potential function in case of SHM?

ehild
 
ehild said:
What is the characteristics of the potential function in case of SHM?

Minimum at the mean position.
 
How do you know if a function has minimum?

ehild
 
ehild said:
How do you know if a function has minimum?

ehild

By differentiating the given function.
 
ehild said:
And?
And set the derivative equal to zero.

[tex]\frac{dU}{d\theta}=2mgR\sin(\theta)-2mgr\sin(\theta)-mgr\sin((\frac{R}{r}-1)\theta)(\frac{R}{r}-1)=0[/tex]
Simplifying, I end up with this:
[tex]2\sin(\theta)=\sin((\frac{R}{r}-1)\theta)[/tex]

How should I proceed from here?
 
ehild said:
dU/dθ =0 at θ=0?

ehild

Yes, its zero at θ=0.
 
ehild said:
Is is maximum, minimum, saddle?

ehild

I guess I have reached the answer. It should be minimum so that SHM takes place. For this, the second derivative is greater than zero at θ=0.
[tex]\frac{d^2U}{d\theta^2}=2mgR \cos(\theta)-2mgr \cos(\theta)-mgr \cos((\frac{R}{r}-1})\theta)(\frac{R}{r}-1})^2[/tex]
(Why the above code is not shown properly? :confused: )
At θ=0
[tex]\frac{d^2U}{d\theta^2}=2mgR-2mgr-mg\frac{(R-r)^2}{r}>0[/tex]
[tex]mg(R-r)\frac{(3r-R)}{r}>0[/tex]
Hence,
[tex]\frac{r}{R}>\frac{1}{3}[/tex]
The least r/R ratio is thus 1/3.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
I guess I have reached the answer. It should be minimum so that SHM takes place. For this, the second derivative is greater than zero at θ=0.
[tex]\frac{d^2U}{d\theta^2}=2mgR \cos(\theta)-2mgr \cos(\theta)-mgr \cos((\frac{R}{r}-1)\theta)(\frac{R}{r}-1)^2[/tex]
(Why the above code is not shown properly? :confused: )
At θ=0
[tex]\frac{d^2U}{d\theta^2}=2mgR-2mgr-mg\frac{(R-r)^2}{r}>0[/tex]
[tex]mg(R-r)\frac{(3r-R)}{r}>0[/tex]
Hence,
[tex]\frac{r}{R}>\frac{1}{3}[/tex]
The least r/R ratio is thus 1/3.

Well done!

ehild
 
ehild said:
Well done!

ehild

Thanks ehild for the help! :smile:

Btw, is there any trick to do this question? This question is from a test paper and the solution says that for stable equilibrium, the condition is
[tex]\frac{1}{h}>\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R}[/tex]
How did they arrived at this relation?
 
ehild said:
What is h?

ehild

The solution says that h is the height of centre of mass of ring particle system.
 
The position is stable if the CM gets higher when the system is displaced. I do not see at the moment how that relation comes out.

ehild
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Btw, is there any trick to do this question? This question is from a test paper and the solution says that for stable equilibrium, the condition is
[tex]\frac{1}{h}>\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R}[/tex]
How did they arrived at this relation?

Use the same type of geometry you have already used to show that the change in height of the CM may be expressed as

##\Delta h = (R-r)(1-cos\theta) - (h-r)[1-cos(\frac{R-r}{r}\theta)]##

Use small angle approximation ##cos\beta = 1-\beta^2/2## to simplify the condition ##\Delta h >0## for small displacement of the hoop.
 

Attachments

  • Ring in Hoop.jpg
    Ring in Hoop.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 475
Last edited:
TSny said:
Use the same type of geometry you have already used to show that the change in height of the CM may be expressed as

##\Delta h = (R-r)(1-cos\theta) - (h-r)[1-cos(\frac{R-r}{r}\theta)]##

Use small angle approximation ##cos\beta = 1-\beta^2/2## to simplify the condition ##\Delta h >0## for small displacement of the hoop.

Thanks TSny, I did reach the relation now but how can I find the least ration using the relation? :confused:
 
ehild said:
What is h in terms of r?

ehild

Oops, totally missed it, I was so much involved in deriving that equation of TSny that I forgot to use the value of h. :redface:

Thanks once again both of you. :smile: