Short/Open Circuit time constant method: b1

kougou
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The short circuit time constant method for determining 3dB point for high pass filter says

b1= the sum of short circuit time constant seen by each individual capacitor with the all other capacitor replaced by short circuit.

b1 is also = the sum of pole1, pole2...


I am not very convince by this statement. How should I see that
[the sum of poles] = b1 = [the sum of short circuit time constant seen by each capacitor] ?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
. Homework EquationsThe equations are given in the statement. The Attempt at a SolutionI am not sure how to conceptually prove this statement. I have read some articles and it says that it is due to the fact that all other capacitor are short circuited, hence resulting in b1 = [the sum of short circuit time constant seen by each capacitor]. However, I am not sure how to interpret this conceptually. For example, if the high pass filter consists of two capacitors, C1 and C2 with resistance R1 and R2 respectively, then the sum of the poles [C1/(R1 + R2)] + [C2/(R1 + R2)] = b1 [C1/R1 + C2/R2] ? I am not sure how to explain this. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top