Short question about graphing AC voltage before rectificaiton

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct interpretation of AC voltage in a circuit before rectification, particularly the relationship between Vp and ground. Participants clarify that Vp represents the positive pulse, not the negative, and emphasize the importance of proper wiring in the circuit diagram. There is a consensus that Vp must always be higher than the ground connection to avoid short circuits. The conversation also touches on the significance of transformer phase relationships and the need for accurate calculations involving pull-down voltages. Overall, the thread highlights the nuances of AC voltage graphing and circuit design.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, Vp to the ground isn't the negative pulse.
It's the positive pulse.

Perhaps you should try to solve the circuit for a couple of voltages.
 
I think RL (and not its end where you have written "K") should return to the rectifier junction where you have Earth wrongly connected.
 
I agree with Nascent about the peculiar wiring on this diagram.
FP you actually indicate a better wiring in your 1st post of an earlier question :)
 
Hi FP :smile:
Your full wave bridge rectifier connections look much better.

VP starts from the negative input
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/927/ppppv.jpg
VP would only be a negative voltage if your transformer secondary were 180^o out of phase (as in dot notation of following figure) However, when they don't explicitly use dot notation, we assume the secondary is in-phase (What does that mean? what ILS also alluded, VP-to-Gnd is the positive voltage).

scrcircuitxfrmroutofphase.jpg



I don't see where you are taking the pull-down voltage into consideration. Perhaps you could say in you calculations V_{A-G}(max)[\frac{N_ב}{N_א}]
http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m543/loxandbagels/scrcircuitwithpulldownxfmr.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From some reason I always thought that it's the other way around...

http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/9165/oppositenormal.jpg

But you're my source, Quab, so I'll amend my err and instead of the dotted line for VP I'll add a full line indicating there's a voltage there, and at negative wave there isn't. Much appreciated
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Femme_physics said:
But you're my source, Quab, so I'll amend my ... Much appreciated
Thank you for your faith in my comments. Though the nice thing about this forum,
if I made an error, I am sure someone will 'politely' supply correction. :smile:

So my username Ouabache is the French spelling of a native American word
for the river that runs alongside my university in northern Indiana. (etymology)
 
Last edited:
Femme_physics said:
From some reason I always thought that it's the other way around...

Regardless of the orientation, opposite or normal, Vp always has to be higher than the Earth connection (0 V).

If Vp were lower than the Earth connection, you'd have a short circuit.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top