Shorten equations with math notations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BadatPhysicsguy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a more efficient way to demonstrate the three smallest Pythagorean triangles: (3, 4, 5), (6, 8, 10), and (5, 12, 13), using the equation a^2 + b^2 = c^2. Participants suggest that instead of individually verifying each case, one could generalize the approach using mathematical notation or modular arithmetic to identify necessary conditions for a and b. It is noted that defining "smallest" by area may lead to different considerations, emphasizing the importance of the shortest side in calculations. Additionally, while some propose using computational methods for exhaustive checks, others argue that a systematic approach could yield quicker results. Overall, the conversation highlights the balance between theoretical exploration and practical computation in solving the problem.
BadatPhysicsguy
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Show that the three smallest pythagorean triangles are (3, 4, 5), (6, 8, 10) and (5,12, 13).

Homework Equations


a^2 + b^2 = c^2

The Attempt at a Solution


The obvious thing to do would be to simply show that a triangle with the hypothenuse 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 12 simply do not satisfy the pythagorean equation (a^2+b^2=c^2) but instead of showing this through 11 separate solutions, is there anyway to shorten this, generalize it or use something like a sum notation (sigma)? Would be pretty unneccesary to waste two pages on simply writing it all out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write a computer program to do that for you. It won't be hard!
 
First question is what is meant by smallest here? The most reasonable is by area, so it might not be ok only to look at hypotenuses less than 13.
Assuming area, better to work in terms of the length of the shortest side - fewer choices.
It is possible to deduce a general form for solutions. Not sure if you're expected to be able to do that.
 
I don't know about shortening anything, but it does clarify to put some mathematical notation on the problem. So for example say the triangle edge lengths are labelled ##a##, ##b## and (hypotenuse) ##c##, with ##0<a \leq b<c##.

Then you can review possibilities based on ##a## and ##b##. For a particular ##a##, you could infer where to stop with ##b## by finding the smallest ##n## such that ##(n+1)^2 - n^2 = 2n + 1 > a^2##

Also, you could investigate square numbers under modular arithmetic. This would let you show that ##a## and ##b## needs at least one multiple of 3 and one even number (mod 4 tells you this) and (interestingly) that either ##a##, ##b##, ##(a+b)## or ##(b-a)## must be a multiple of 7.

Of course you could just draw up an exhaustive table too. Sometimes brute force is quicker, especially in Excel.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top