Should i be worried? (DE Course)

AI Thread Summary
Concerns about missing content in a Differential Equations (DE) course, particularly regarding systems of ODEs and Laplace transforms, were discussed. While these topics are important for applications in fields like geophysics, it's suggested that the current course may still provide a solid foundation. Students are encouraged to self-study these topics if necessary, as they can be learned independently later. Additionally, taking a follow-up course could enhance understanding and application of DE concepts. Overall, the course is considered adequate, but further exploration of advanced topics could be beneficial.
Remixex
Messages
57
Reaction score
4
Hello all, my question is if i should or not be worried about the apparent "missing" (or alternative) content about my DE course.
My DE course (and the only one in the list of courses i must take to get my degree) consisted on
First order ODEs (Separation of variables, homogeneous, Bernoulli's, etc) -> Applications (Newton's law of cooling, mixing problems, etc)-> "Superior" order ODEs (Oscillations, Euler's equation, variation of parameters, etc)-> Fourier Series (Coefficients, convergence, Parseval's identity)->Sturm Liouville problems -> Linear PDEs (Separation of variables, Source term, Wave equation, Laplace's equation, Heat equation, membrane problems)
Now onto the question at hand, we didn't see what most ODE specific courses do, system of ODEs and Laplace transform.
I'm aiming for a Geophysics degree and I'm finishing my second year, should i be worried about this missing content? Should i try to learn it by myself? Or is this course "good enough"?
Thanks beforehand
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remixex said:
"Superior" order ODEs
What are these? ODEs of order higher than one?
Remixex said:
system of ODEs
If the answer to the question I asked above is "yes", then you will encounter systems of ODEs, because every ODE of order ##n## can be written as a system of ##n## (generally coupled) ODEs of order ##1##.
Remixex said:
Laplace transform.
I would not worry too much about missing this in the course. It is very important for certain applications (e.g. in linear systems and control). If needed, you can easily pick up a book later on and learn it yourself.
Remixex said:
should i be worried about this missing content? Should i try to learn it by myself? Or is this course "good enough"?
I don't think you should be worried, but I would perhaps consider taking a second course at some point during your student life. There are very interesting applications of (P)DE in geophysics that this course may not even touch upon, such as fluid flow or flow through porous media.

Incidentally, for a more qualitative, geometric view towards differential equations that connects well to current research and application, I could recommend the third edition of Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and an Introduction to Chaos by Hirsch, Smale and Devaney, 2012. The first edition is titled Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems and Linear Algebra by Hirsch and Smale, 1974. It is a beautiful book, accessible but a bit more mathematical than the subsequent editions.

It is my impression that some students are put off by a lot of initial courses on DE because they (still) focus on analytical solution techniques. If your course is like that, the geometric approach may provide some fresh motivation.
 
  • Like
Likes Remixex
Yes superior order is order higher than one but still ODEs (that's how we named it here), such as a 3rd order Euler's equation.
Thanks for the advice, the follow-up course of this (the one I'm taking and trying to finish right now) is called Oscillations and waves , which expanded on many of these concepts (the problem is no longer how to solve the differential equation, it is about actually writing it down interpreting the physical phenomena presented, and doing the correct approximations so an analytical solution is valid) , but the course is still analytical, numerical methods courses are a couple of semesters ahead.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top