Studying Should I expect myself to "know everything"?

AI Thread Summary
Understanding the fundamentals of mechanics is essential, but encountering complex and novel problems is a common experience among learners. It is normal to feel challenged when faced with new problems, and relying on professors or solution manuals is part of the learning process. The ability to tackle these problems often improves with experience and practice. While one should be able to solve variations of familiar problems independently, more complex issues may require additional time and effort. It is important to recognize that even experienced individuals may struggle with new problems, and breaking down complex issues into manageable parts is a valuable technique. Overall, learners should set realistic expectations for their progress and understand that mastery takes time.
WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
14
I'm not sure how to put this into words but...here goes.

After going through chapters and chapters of introductory mechanics, I think I can say that I at least some of the basics down. However, when I introduce myself to extremely novel problems, I get stunned at their complexity and have to resort to asking professors and consulting their "solution manuals".

My question is:
Is this normal? Or should one be able to sweep aside novel problems with some degree of ease if one understands the fundamentals (i.e I'm far off from understanding the fundamental bits of mechanics).

I know it might be a silly line of inquiry but I'm hoping to get insight from the more experienced to set up realistic targets for my work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the most important techniques for solving "complex" problems is to make them less complex by breaking them down into parts. This is not always easy of course and it can be particularly challenging if you lack experience. No one knows "everthing" and some folks are better than others in figuring out how to get started on problems.

How about you give a specific example of a problem that you experienced this with so we get a feel for just where you are?
 
WWCY said:
Is this normal?
Yes, but see below.
WWCY said:
Or should one be able to sweep aside novel problems with some degree of ease if one understands the fundamentals (i.e I'm far off from understanding the fundamental bits of mechanics).
I think it depends on how "novel" these problems are. When they are variations on the problems that you have been practicing with in class or in the book, I think you should be able to do them without consulting solution manuals. When they are slightly more difficult, I still believe you should be able to do them on your own, but it may require more time and effort. This is fine.

Yet, I am convinced that it is almost always possible to think of a new problem, using only concepts that were discussed in the course, and such that even the lecturer may have a hard time providing a solution. At least in my field (applied mathematics) this is the case.

So, no, you should not expect yourself to know everything, in the sense that you defined it.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top