Should I take solid state physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an undergraduate considering taking a solid state physics course, specifically using Kittel's text, despite not having completed a formal quantum mechanics class. The importance of having a solid understanding of certain quantum mechanics concepts is emphasized, particularly the particle in a one-dimensional well and the Schrödinger equation. Participants highlight that while solid state physics is grounded in quantum mechanics, much of the course focuses on statistical mechanics and developing a conceptual understanding of solids rather than heavy mathematical computations. The consensus is that the course is worthwhile and engaging, with many recommending a review of key quantum mechanics topics before starting the class.
ZetaOfThree
Gold Member
Messages
109
Reaction score
23
I am an undergrad and for the most part I am looking for a good physics class to take. I am considering taking solid state physics at the level of Kittel as its one of the only physics classes offered at the undergrad level this semester that I haven't taken. I haven't taken quantum mechanics yet (it's not offered this semester), but I have a decent grasp of it from self-study. I mention this because quantum is a prereq. What things from quantum should I be solid with for studying solid state physics? Also, do you think solid state is interesting? I'm not really taking this class for research interests or anything, just to further my general knowledge of physics. I plan to talk to the professor about all this, but I am still curious of your opinions. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solid-State Physics (and the Kittel text) are incredibly interesting. One of my favorite classes. Even though solid-state physics is built on a foundation of QM, most of the math you use to solve problems is statistical mechanics and the rest is typically developed in the course. When I took it QM was used to develop the idea of quantum states in a periodic lattice, but after that explicit QM wasn't used much.

My guess is you'll do fine if you're at least familiar with QM, but yeah, ask the professor.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Solid State Physics is very worth it. It was my favorite class next to statistical mechanics; it is a class which is not about math and number crunching, but more about learning how to think about solids, much like statistical mechanics is a class about learning how to think about large systems. You learn something new every time.

You need to know how to solve for a particle in a 1-D well and know what the Schrodinger equation is though.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks very much for the replies! I decided to enroll in the course but it doesn't start for a few days. What things from QM, stat mech, etc do you think it would be useful to review before the course starts?
 
Particle in a box. That is usually how they start in solid-state.
 
1. Fermi-Dirac distribution
2. Know what the Schrodinger equation is
3. Know how to solve it for a particle in a 1-D well.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top