Should I Use PID Regulator for My Control System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rasco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pid Regulator
AI Thread Summary
Using a PID regulator for controlling systems like an inverted pendulum offers advantages in managing system dynamics, such as rise time and settling time. While a PID controller can be designed based on linearized transfer functions from an LTI system, a simpler proportional controller can also be employed, though it may not provide the same level of control. The choice between using a PID controller or a simpler approach depends on the specific requirements of the system and desired performance. Additionally, the discussion touches on the relationship between PID control and observer design, though this connection remains unclear. Ultimately, PID controllers are generally preferred for their enhanced control capabilities.
rasco
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a very basic conceptual question. I have a system (eg. inverted pendulum) that I want to control. So I need to build a controller. That is clear. If I understand it well, I have minimally two separate options:
1 - use PID regulator/controller
2 - analyze the system, linearize it about a specific point so I create LTI system and based on this design my own closed loop controller.
3 - ?

But, when and why should I choose first or second option? What are advantages and disadvantages of each approach? What are other possible solutions?

Thank you in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You've laid out the basic controller design steps in option 2 and you can use PID as the controller of the closed-loop system. Once you have an LTI system to deal with, you can determine from the transfer functions how big to make your PID parameters such that it approximates an ideal system. This is so you can control things like rise time, settling time, gain, etc.
 
So, I create LTI system in order to determine PID parameters. But I also have an option to create a simple controller based on closed loop formula u = -K*x, right? Or this formula is just a proportional controller, that means it is P letter from PID regulator?
And how is all this related to observer?
Thx
 
Last edited:
Sure, you can just have a proportional controller which would be like a u=-K*x formula, but the PID usually does better. You can control your system a lot more with PID. I'm not sure how exactly how this relates to observer.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top