Programs Should You Apply for a PhD Track to Secure a Master's Admission?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the strategic decision of applying for a PhD program to increase admission chances for a funded master's in physics, despite not intending to pursue a PhD. Participants highlight that universities often favor PhD candidates due to the longer commitment and potential for more research output, which benefits faculty CVs and career advancement. Concerns are raised about the ethical implications of taking a PhD slot from a genuine candidate, with some expressing discomfort about the idea of using the system for personal gain. Ultimately, the conversation reflects a tension between personal ambition and ethical considerations in academic admissions.
Thert Gurt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Suppose that I would like a master's in physics, but not a PhD, and consider a university that offers a funded master's program.
I understand that universities prefer to take PhD students rather that MS students (since one may squeeze more cheap research labor out of a 3+ year grad student than out of a 1 or 2 year grad student).
So...should I apply for a PhD track, to increase my chances of addmission?
I have no ethical concerns.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thert Gurt said:
Suppose that I would like a master's in physics, but not a PhD, and consider a university that offers a funded master's program.
I understand that universities prefer to take PhD students rather that MS students (since one may squeeze more cheap research labor out of a 3+ year grad student than out of a 1 or 2 year grad student).
So...should I apply for a PhD track, to increase my chances of addmission?
I have no ethical concerns.

It's not only squeeze labor. It also looks better on Professors' CVs, and is a requirement for them to move up the ladder from Assistant to Full Professor.
 
Thert Gurt said:
I have no ethical concerns.

Evidently not. It's not, however, something I would be proud of.

By doing this you will be depriving someone else of their chance to get a PhD, because you will be in their "slot". I don't think that's something PF should be encouraging.

Thread locked.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top