Show a second angular speed given a reduced radius

AI Thread Summary
A particle on a string initially at a radius of 0.22m with an angular speed of 0.55 rad/s has its string shortened to 0.15m. The conservation of angular momentum is applied to show that the new angular speed is 1.18 rad/s. By equating the initial and final angular momentum, the calculation confirms that the values are consistent within a small margin of error. The approach emphasizes the relationship between radius and angular speed, demonstrating how reducing the radius increases the angular speed. The final formula derived is ω_f = ω_i (r_i^2 / r_f^2), confirming the new angular speed.
littlemayhem
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle on a string at radius r=0.22m is moving in a (horizontal) circle with angular speed \omega =0.55 rad/s. The string is shortened to 0.15m. Show that the new angular speed is 1.18rad/s

Homework Equations



v = r\omega
a = \omega^{2}r
a = r\alpha
\omega^{2}_f = \omega^{2}_{i} + 2 \theta\alpha

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay. At first I thought this is really simple, which means I'm missing something. I assumed that there was no acceleration, and velocity was constant, but that can't be the case.

I tried r_{i} * \omega_{i} = 0.121
and then tried
r_{f} * \omega_{f} = 0.177

Which clearly isn't right for constant velocity - there must be acceleration, but I don't know over what period the acceleration occurs. I've looked at the kinematics equations for angular motion, but they either involve time or theta, variables not mentioned.

I know it says speed, but I'm presuming it means acceleration - and vectors aren't really relevant in this case, anyway, since there's no change of direction.

The only thing I can think is that we're supposed to work backwards, knowing that the acceleration is from 0.55 to 1.18 rad, but I don't know how to work that out in rad/s^{2}, because that involves time.

I just want a way to approach the problem. We're studying moments of inertia mainly, I'm also thinking I might just be looking at this the wrong way, but I'm not sure. Any guidance would be appreciated - I really want to have a clear understanding from my own workings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
littlemayhem said:
I just want a way to approach the problem.
Try the conservation of angular momentum.
 
Thank you!

Okay:

L = r x p = r p sin \theta where sin 90 = 1 so

L = rp & p=mv so

L = rmv and v = \omegar so

L = r^{2}m\omega

if we equate {r^{2}m\omega}_{initial} and {r^{2}m\omega}_{final} and cancel the mass (which stays the same), we get

r^{2}_i * \omega_i = r^{2}_f * \omega_f

with the values included, we have

0.22 * 0.22 * 0.55 = 0.15 * 0.15 * 1.18

which equal 0.02662 and 0.02655 respectively.

I suppose that the small difference is attributable to the fact that the initial values were given only to two decimal places, and thus that my calculation is correct?
 
Nice work. Looks good to me.
\omega _f = \omega _i \frac{{r_i^2 }}{{r_f^2 }} = 0.55\frac{{0.22^2 }}{{0.15^2 }} = 1.18{\rm{rad}} \cdot {\rm{s}}^{ - 1}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top