MHB Show deg of minimal poly = dimension of V

  • Thread starter Thread starter catsarebad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the degree of the minimal polynomial u_L of a linear operator L on a finite-dimensional vector space V equals the dimension of V. It begins with the assertion that if C_x spans V, then the degree of the minimal polynomial derived from L should correspond to the dimension of V. The argument involves identifying the smallest integer m such that the set {x, L(x), ..., L^m(x)} becomes linearly dependent, leading to a polynomial p that L satisfies. The conclusion drawn is that the degree of the minimal polynomial is less than or equal to the dimension of V, while also establishing that the set is linearly independent, thus confirming that the degree of u_L is indeed equal to dim(V). This establishes a crucial link between the minimal polynomial and the structure of the vector space.
catsarebad
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
if V = C_x for some x belongs to V then show

deg(u_L) = dim(V)

here,

L: V -> V linear operator on finite dimensional vector space

C_x = span {x, L(x), L^2(x),....}

u_L = minimal polynomial

my thought:

since C_x = V, it spans V. if it spans v, then degree of minimal poly that we somehow obtain from L should be dim(V). i dunno.

i can't figure out how to connect C_x and L with minimal poly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If $C_x = V$ for some $x$ (such an $x$ is clearly non-zero), then consider the smallest $m$ for which:

$\{x,Lx,\dots,L^mx\}$ is linearly dependent.

By the definition of linearly dependent, this means we have $c_0,c_1\dots,c_m$ not all 0 with:

$c_0x + c_1Lx +\cdots + c_mL^mx = 0$.

By the minimality of $m$, $c_m \neq 0$.

Thus $L$ satisfies the polynomial (since $x$ is non-zero):

$p(x) = c_0 + c_1x + \cdots + c_mx^m$

Therefore (since $p(L) = 0$) we conclude that $\mu_L|p$.

But if $L^mx$ is a linear combination of $\{x,Lx,...,L^{m-1}x\}$ then any higher power of $L$ is likewise a linear combination of these (you may want to supply an inductive proof of this..up to you).

Thus $V$ = span($C_x$) = span($\{x,Lx,...,L^{m-1}x\}$).

and we have $m = $ dim$(V)$.

The above shows that deg($\mu_L$) $\leq$ dim($V$).

Now argue that $\{x,Lx,...,L^{m-1}x\}$ is linearly independent, to show that:

deg($\mu_L$) $> m - 1$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K