Show momentum is conserved in two different frames (relativity)

Ravenatic20
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2000-kg car moving with a speed of 20 m/s collides with and sticks to a 1500-kg car at rest. Show that because momentum is conserved in the rest frame, momentum is also conserved in a reference frame moving with a speed of 10 m/s in the direction of the moving car.

Homework Equations


Not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


Let's have the larger (2000-kg) car be mass M, and the smaller (1500-kg) car to be mass m. Car M is traveling at speed v. After the collision, the two cars become one mass (M+m) and its velocity we will call v'.

To an observer on the ground...
mv + 0 = (M+m) v'
v' = MV/(M+m)

To an observer in a moving frame...
M is moving at speed V-v (towards the smaller car, m) and m is moving at speed -v (towards the larger vehicle, M). After the collision, (M+m) is moving at speed v'-v.
M(V-v) - mv = (M+m)(v'-v)
MV - Mv - mv + Mv + mv = (M+m)v'
v' = MV/(M+m)

These two equations are the same, meaning the final speed of the indecent is v' from any observer. Does this mean momentum is also conserved in a reference frame? If I'm on the right track, what good would it do plugging in numbers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re-read the question. You need to prove that conservation of momentum in the rest frame implies conservation of momentum in the moving frame. You're also not being consistent with your notation. The v in your first set of equations represents the speed of the bigger car, but in the second set of equations it represents the relative speed of the moving frame.
 
You're right. I ended up solving the problem. Thanks anyways.

Consider this problem solved.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
709
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top