Show that a longitudinal wave is electrostatic

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that all longitudinal waves must be electrostatic by using Faraday's law.


Homework Equations


Faraday's law:

\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} = - \nabla \times \vec{E}


The Attempt at a Solution


Where should I start??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good place to start would be to write down any equations for the electric and magnetic fields (or auxiliary field H) for longitudinal EM waves. Then calculate dB/dt (or dH/dt)...what do you get?
 
I tried with

\vec{B} = B_0 \sin{[i(kx-\omega t)]}

so

\nabla \times \vec{E} = i \omega B_0 \cos{[i(kx-\omega t)]}

But that doesn't really help me.
 
Logarythmic said:
I tried with

\vec{B} = B_0 \sin{[i(kx-\omega t)]}

so

\nabla \times \vec{E} = i \omega B_0 \cos{[i(kx-\omega t)]}

But that doesn't really help me.

Don't you mean:

\vec{B} = \vec{B_0} \sin{[i(kx-\omega t)]}

and

\nabla \times \vec{E} = \Re[i \omega \vec{B_0} \cos{[i(kx-\omega t)]}]


...what is the real part of a purely imaginary number?:wink:
 
Sometimes I feel so smart that I don't know what to do with myself. ;) Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top