Show that [properties] can be deduced as a theorems, Spivak

  • Thread starter Thread starter usn7564
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties Spivak
usn7564
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg228/scaled.php?server=228&filename=theorem.png&res=landing

Picked up Spivak's Calculus, 3rd ed. and just started. Got to this question and I'm honestly not sure how to start, I looked in the answer book which didn't really clue me in any more.
If I understand the question it wants me to work within the four properties and show that there is no contradiction/they all have to apply? Not a native English speaker so I haven't had maths in English but that's what I got from it.

More interested in how to approach it rather than answers, would assume there's coming a lot more similar questions. Not really done any proof based maths up until now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
usn7564 said:

Homework Statement


http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg228/scaled.php?server=228&filename=theorem.png&res=landing

Picked up Spivak's Calculus, 3rd ed. and just started. Got to this question and I'm honestly not sure how to start, I looked in the answer book which didn't really clue me in any more.
If I understand the question it wants me to work within the four properties and show that there is no contradiction/they all have to apply? Not a native English speaker so I haven't had maths in English but that's what I got from it.

More interested in how to approach it rather than answers, would assume there's coming a lot more similar questions. Not really done any proof based maths up until now.

P10-P12 are properties given in the book previously(which you haven't included). You need to prove those properties using the given new ones.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, Christ, no wonder I didn't get it even with the answers in front of me. Know what direction I'm heading now at least, ta.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
462
Replies
10
Views
29K
Back
Top