Show that the two wave functions are eigenfunction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the wave functions ψ0(x)=e^(-x²/2) and ψ1(x)=xe^(-x²/2) are eigenfunctions of the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian H with eigenvalues ½ and 3/2, respectively. Participants emphasize the need to apply the definitions of eigenfunctions and orthogonality rather than just taking derivatives or products. Additionally, the task involves finding a coefficient 'a' to ensure that ψ2(x)=(1+ax²)e^(-x²/2) is orthogonal to ψ0(x) and demonstrating that ψ2(x) is an eigenfunction of H with eigenvalue 5/2. The conversation highlights the importance of thorough mathematical application in these proofs. Overall, the thread seeks clarity on the correct methods for solving these quantum mechanics problems.
gfxroad
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the dimensionless harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian
HP2X2, P=-i d/dx.
  1. Show that the two wave functions ψ0(x)=e-x2/2 and ψ1(x)=xe-x2/2 are eigenfunction of H with eigenvalues ½ and 3/2, respectively.
  2. Find the value of the coefficient a such that ψ2(x)=(1+ax2)e-x2/2 is orthogonal to ψ0(x). Then show that ψ2(x) is an eigenfunction of H with eigenvalue 5/2.

The Attempt at a Solution


For orthogonality the wave function product must equal to zero, and for eigenfunction we take the second derivative for both wave functions and make a comparison between the eigenvalues.
But I can't finalise the problem, so I appreciate any help in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show working.
Your method is sort of OK.
It's a bit more than just taking the product or the second derivative.
You have to apply the definitions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top