Show that wave packet is an eigenstate to operator

Bapelsin
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Show that wave packet is an eigenstate to operator [SOLVED]

Homework Statement



For a harmonic oscillator we can define the step up and down operators \hat{a} and \hat{a}^{\dagger} and their action as

\hat{a}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}+\frac{\imath}{m\omega}\hat{p}) \quad \hat{a}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle

\hat{a}^{\dagger}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}-\frac{\imath}{m\omega}\hat{p}) \quad \hat{a}^{\dagger}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle

Show that the Gaussian wave-packet

\Psi(x)=\left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4}e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)}

is an eigenstate to \hat{a} with eigenvalue \alpha.
\hat{a}|a\rangle = \alpha | a\rangle

Express the eigenvalue in terms of x_t and p_t.

Homework Equations



See above.

The Attempt at a Solution



\hat{p} \rightarrow -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}

gives the expression for

\hat{a}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}+\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\frac{\partial}{\partial x})

\hat{a}|\Psi\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}} \left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4}\left(e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)} + \frac{\hbar}{m\omega}(-\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}(x-x_t)+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)})\right) = <br /> \Psi\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(1+(x-x_t)+\frac{\imath}{m\omega}p_t\right)

which is obviously not a scalar times \Psi.

What am I doing wrong here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot the x in the first term in parentheses (which comes from the x operator multiplied by Psi).

Here, cut out the clutter (h is supposed to be hbar in what follows):

C = (mω/h)1/2

A = (h/mω)

Then:

a|Ψ> = C(x + A ∂/∂x)Ψ

= C(xΨ + A∂Ψ/∂x)

= C(xΨ + A[(-mω/h)(x-xt) + (i/h)pt]Ψ)

=C(xΨ + A[-A-1xΨ + A-1xtΨ + (i/h)ptΨ])

See anything that might cancel?
 
Yes. Thank you!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top