Show these functions are 2 pi periodic

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the 2π periodicity of the functions g(t) and h(t), defined in terms of another function f(t). It highlights confusion regarding the transformation of -t to t-2π in the periodicity proof, clarifying that substituting t+2π into f(-t) results in f(-t - 2π) instead. An example using the exponential definition of the cosine function illustrates the periodicity concept effectively. The conversation emphasizes that the problem assumes f(t) must be periodic with a period of 2π for the conclusions about g and h to hold true. The original poster has not returned for further clarification, leaving some points unresolved.
bbq pizza
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Member warned about posting without the HW template
g(t)=½( f(t)+f(-t) ) h(t)=½( f(t)-f(-t) )
show its 2π periodic so: g(t+2π) = ½( f(t+2π)+f(t-2π) ) why does -t become t-2π ?
½( f(t)+f(-t) ) = g(t)
h(t+2π)=½( f(t+2π)-f(t-2π) )
½( f(t)-f(-t) ) = h(t) is this correct?
can anybody show me some similar examples please?
this is from a Fourier series question paper.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course, this problem is false unless ##f(t) = f(t+2\pi)##, which you haven't told us.

bbq pizza said:
g(t)=½( f(t)+f(-t) ) h(t)=½( f(t)-f(-t) )
show its 2π periodic so: g(t+2π) = ½( f(t+2π)+f(t-2π) ) why does -t become t-2π ?

It doesn't. If you put ##t+2\pi## in for ##t## in ##f(-t)## you get ##f(-(t+2\pi)) = f(-t -2\pi)##. Do you see why the numerator becomes ##f(t)+f(-t)##?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
An example would be the exponential definition of the cosine function.
##\cos(x) = \frac{1}{2} (e^{ix} + e^{-ix}) ##
This is analogous to your problem for ##g(x)## with ##f(x) = e^{ix}##.
##\cos(x+2\pi) = \frac{1}{2} (e^{i(x+2\pi)} + e^{-i(x+2\pi)})\\
= \frac{1}{2} (e^{ix}e^{i2\pi} +e^{-ix}e^{-i2\pi})\\
= \frac{1}{2} (e^{ix} + e^{-ix})\\
= \cos(x) ##
 
Hint: prove that if a function has period T, then ##f(x-T)=f(x)## as long as f is defined in x-T.
 
Last edited:
LCKurtz said:
Of course, this problem is false unless ##f(t) = f(t+2\pi)##,
or maybe the sum of a periodic function and an odd function.
 
LCKurtz said:
Of course, this problem is false unless ##f(t) = f(t+2\pi)##, which you haven't told us.

haruspex said:
or maybe the sum of a periodic function and an odd function.

Well, I assumed, which was also unstated, that problem was to prove that if ##f## has period ##2\pi##, then when you write ##f = g + h## with ##g## even and ##h## odd, that ##g## and ##h## have period ##2\pi##. In that context I'm not sure what you are suggesting.

And, annoyingly enough and a pet peeve of mine, the OP hasn't returned to the thread to clarify anything
 
Last edited:
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top