Show wave equations for E & B consistent with potentials

  • Thread starter Thread starter insynC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potentials Wave
insynC
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There are a couple of introductory questions that aren't relevant to the last parts then it says:

(d) If the current density is time independent and divergence free, show that the Maxwell Equations separate into independent equations for E and B.

(e) Express E in terms of the electrostatic potential φ, and B in terms of the vector potential A. Show that the equations in question (d) are satisfied when (in Coulomb Gauge) φ and A satisfy Poisson equations. Write down those equations.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have (with some help) figured out (d) and I got a homogeneous wave equation for B and an inhomogeneous wave equation for E (the inhomogeneity created by a ∇(ρ/ε) term).

However subbing in A and φ for B and E leads only to mess, I have no idea how to simplify it. I looked through a list of identities, but they were no help. I need to find a way to rearrange it so that I can make use of properties like the Coulomb Gauge and Poisson's equation, but I'm not sure how.

Any help would be great, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you show me the mess you are getting, I'll be better able to help you.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top