Showing that Energy-momentum relation is invariant

Rubber Ducky
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
A particle of mass m is moving in the +x-direction with speed u and has momentum p and energy E in the frame S.

(a) If S' is moving at speed v, find the momentum p' and energy E' in the S' frame.
(b) Note that E' \neq E and p' \neq p, but show that (E')^2-(p')^2c^2=E^2-p^2c^2

Homework Equations


[/B]
E=p^2c^2+m^2c^4
E'=\gamma mc^2=\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(u')^2}{c^2}}}
p'=\gamma mu'=\frac{mu'}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(u')^2}{c^2}}}
u'=\frac{u-v}{1-\frac{uv}{c^2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



My prof says we need to use (a) to derive (b). It seems like it'd be easier a different way, but whatever. My strategy has been to show that (E')^2-(p')^2c^2=m^2c^4, which would complete the derivation.

I tried playing around with some algebra and got (E')^2=\frac{m^2c^4(c^2-uv)^2}{(c^2-u^2)(c^2-v^2)} and (p')^2=\frac{m^2(u-v)^2}{(1-\frac{uv}{c^2})^2(c^2-u^2)(c^2-v^2)}

I got a little overwhelmed with the algebra at this point. I'd like to know if this is right so far, at least, before trying anything else.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part (a), you should be able to show that
\begin{eqnarray*}
E' &= \gamma(E - \beta pc) \\
p'c &= \gamma(pc - \beta E)
\end{eqnarray*} where ##\beta = v/c## and ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2}##.

Your expression for ##E'^2## looks okay. Divide both the numerator and denominator by ##c^4## and take the square root. You should be able to show the first equation above. Just make sure you keep track of the three ##\gamma##'s you have in this problem.
 
Last edited:
vela said:
For part (a), you should be able to show that
\begin{eqnarray*}
E' &= \gamma(E - \beta pc) \\
p'c &= \gamma(pc - \beta E)
\end{eqnarray*} where ##\beta = v/c## and ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2}##.

Your expression for ##E'^2## looks okay. Divide both the numerator and denominator by ##c^4## and take the square root. You should be able to show the first equation above. Just make sure you keep track of the three ##\gamma##'s you have in this problem.
Thanks very much for the help. It worked like a charm - the last part of the derivation that I ended up using was pretty neat. My only worry is that my prof will wonder how I thought to express ##E'## and ##cp'## in that way.
 
Look up the Lorentz transformation. :smile: You might already be familiar with it applied to x and t. It applies to all four-vectors.
 
vela said:
Look up the Lorentz transformation. :) You might already be familiar with it applied to x and t. It applies to all four-vectors.
Interesting - we've covered the Lorentz transformation, but not four-vectors. My class gives a brief overview of SR, but maybe I'll see it in future.

I have another question that I'm editing into the OP now - It's somewhat related, but I didn't want to flood the section with threads.

EDIT: Woops, guess it's been too long to edit. See you in the next thread XD
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top