Showing that KE is minimized when objects stick together in a collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter Azu_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an inelastic collision problem involving two masses, where one mass is initially at rest. The goal is to demonstrate that the kinetic energy of the system is minimized when the two objects stick together after the collision. Participants are guided through a series of steps, starting with taking the derivative of the kinetic energy expression with respect to one of the velocity variables. The importance of using momentum conservation in both x and y directions is emphasized, as it helps in substituting variables to show the relationship between the velocities. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in applying these concepts to prove that the final kinetic energy is minimized when the objects are combined.
Azu_
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This problem deals with an inelastic collision, where Mass A is given an initial velocity and collides with Mass B which is initially at rest.

The equation I'm given is

K_f = \frac{1}{2} m_A (V_Ax^2 + V_Ay^2) + \frac{1}{2} m_B (V_Bx^2 + V_By^2)
The x's and y's are part of the subscript.

So the problem says:

Start with the expression shown above for the system's kinetic energy after the collision. Energy is not a vector, but the final total speeds are expressed with x and y components, by Pythagorean theorem. This notation puts them on a comparable footing with momentum, which is a vector.

Show that this quantity is minimized when the objects stick together.

The following steps will walk you through it:

a) Take the derivative with respect to anyone of the four velocity variables (your choice).

b) The x and y directions are independent, i.e. if you pick an x variable, the derivatives of the y variables are 0.

c) The two variables along the same axis are NOT independent. Use momentum to make a substitution. This should lead to some clear conclusions.

d) Now take the 2nd derivative to get the concavity. What sign should it be?

e) Without recomputing, extrapolate what you would have gotten if you had chosen a variable from the other axis in step a (y instead of x, etc.). Why is this step necessary to demonstrate that the objects truly do "stick together"? The attempt at a solution

So for part a, I chose to take the derivative with respect to Vax and I get
dk/dVa = m_A V_A + m_B V_B (dV_B/dV_A)

Now I'm really lost on part c. I'm really unclear as to how to use momentum and what to substitute in.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Azu_ said:
I'm really unclear as to how to use momentum and what to substitute in.
Momentum is a conserved vector, so it is conserved in each of the directions, x and y, separately. Write down two equations expressing this.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top