Why Does Changing Force Direction Affect Acceleration Calculations on a Wedge?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a block sliding on a 45-degree wedge that is accelerating. Key equations are derived to express the block's accelerations in both horizontal and vertical directions, leading to the conclusion that the normal force is influenced by both gravitational and wedge accelerations. A common point of confusion arises from the direction of forces and accelerations, particularly in the vertical component, where the correct application of Newton's second law is emphasized. The participants clarify that the block's downward motion must be accurately represented in the force equations, ensuring consistent directionality in calculations. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between the wedge's acceleration and the block's motion is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
Buffu
Messages
849
Reaction score
146

Homework Statement


A 45 deg wedge is pushed along a table with a constant accelaration A. A block of mass m slides without friction on the wedge. Find its accelaration.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


path4207.png


##(x_b - x_w)\tan \theta = h -y_b##

##\ddot x_b + \ddot y_b = A##

Now equating forces horizontal and vertical forces on the block,

##N\cos \theta - mg = m \ddot y_b##

##N\sin\theta = m \ddot x_b##

Substituting these two in constraint equation,

##\sqrt{2}\times N = mg - mA##

##N = \dfrac{m}{2}(g + A)##

Substituting this back in the equations of forces on the block,

##\ddot x_b = \dfrac{g + A}{2}## and ##\ddot y_b = \dfrac{A - g}{2}##.

This is correct but if I take ##mg -N\cos \theta = m \ddot y_b## I get a wrong answer. For me, since the block is moving downward , ##mg -N\cos \theta## feels more natural and correct than ##-mg +N\cos \theta ##.
Anyway it does not give correct answer it gives ##A = g## which is wrong. I want to know why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buffu said:

Homework Statement


A 45 deg wedge is pushed along a table with a constant accelaration A. A block of mass m slides without friction on the wedge. Find its accelaration.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


View attachment 203762

##(x_b - x_w)\tan \theta = h -y_b##

##\ddot x_b + \ddot y_b = A##

Now equating forces horizontal and vertical forces on the block,

##N\cos \theta - mg = m \ddot y_b##

##N\sin\theta = m \ddot x_b##

Substituting these two in constraint equation,

##\sqrt{2}\times N = mg - mA##

##N = \dfrac{m}{2}(g + A)##

Substituting this back in the equations of forces on the block,

##\ddot x_b = \dfrac{g + A}{2}## and ##\ddot y_b = \dfrac{A - g}{2}##.

This is correct but if I take ##mg -N\cos \theta = m \ddot y_b## I get a wrong answer. For me, since the block is moving downward , ##mg -N\cos \theta## feels more natural and correct than ##-mg +N\cos \theta ##.
Wouldn't the block be moving upward? If the wedge is accelerating to the right, the weight of the block is acting downward, but the vertical component of its acceleration is in the opposite direction -- upward.

Anyway it does not give correct answer it gives ##A = g## which is wrong. I want to know why ?
 
Buffu said:
##\ddot x_b + \ddot y_b = A##
As a vector equation that is true, but not as scalars.
Buffu said:
##\sqrt{2}\times N = mg - mA##
How do you get that? Where did the ##\sqrt{2}## come from?
 
haruspex said:
As a vector equation that is true, but not as scalars.

How do you get that? Where did the ##\sqrt{2}## come from?

##m\ddot x_b + m\ddot y_b = mA##

##N\sin \theta + N\cos \theta - mg = mA##

##\theta = 45^\circ##

##2N/\sqrt{2} = mg + mA \iff N\sqrt{2} = mg + mA##

haruspex said:
As a vector equation that is true, but not as scalars.

Yes I know but I don't know the direction of those vectors.
 
Buffu said:
θ=45∘
Ok, I did not notice you were told that. I only saw the θ in the diagram.
Buffu said:
Yes I know but I don't know the direction of those vectors.
The two accelerations are at right angles. How do you find the magnitude of their vector sum? Hint: Greek gent, name starting with P.
 
haruspex said:
Ok, I did not notice you were told that. I only saw the θ in the diagram.

The two accelerations are at right angles. How do you find the magnitude of their vector sum? Hint: Greek gent, name starting with P.
Pythagoras theorem. ##\vec a = \sqrt{|\ddot x_b |^2 + |\ddot y_b |^2 }## but how is magnitude tell me about direction ?
 
Buffu said:
Pythagoras theorem. ##\vec a = \sqrt{|\ddot x_b |^2 + |\ddot y_b |^2 }## but how is magnitude tell me about direction ?
It doesn't, but it is clearly a correct equation instead of the one you had.
But... you seem to be mixing up the two accelerations. "A" is the given acceleration of the wedge, not the block.

Think about the acceleration of the block relative to the wedge ( X and Y components). What is the component of the normal to the wedge?
 
haruspex said:
It doesn't, but it is clearly a correct equation instead of the one you had.
But... you seem to be mixing up the two accelerations. "A" is the given acceleration of the wedge, not the block.

Think about the acceleration of the block relative to the wedge ( X and Y components). What is the component of the normal to the wedge?

Is ##\ddot x_b + \ddot y_b = A## incorrect ?

Why ? I differentiated ##(x_b - x_w)\tan \theta = h -y_b## twice to get it.
 
Buffu said:
Is ##\ddot x_b + \ddot y_b = A## incorrect ?

Why ? I differentiated ##(x_b - x_w)\tan \theta = h -y_b## twice to get it.
Then please post that working. I do not understand what happened to the tan θ.
 
  • #10
geogebra-export.png


In the small triangle,

##\tan \beta = \dfrac{h - y_b}{x_b - x_w} \iff (x_b - x_w)\tan \beta = h - y_b \iff (\ddot x_b - \ddot x_w)\tan \beta = -\ddot y_b##

Since ##\beta = \theta = 45^\circ##, ##\tan \beta = 1##.

##\ddot x_b - \ddot x_w = -\ddot y_b##.
 
  • #11
Buffu said:
View attachment 203868

In the small triangle,

##\tan \beta = \dfrac{h - y_b}{x_b - x_w} \iff (x_b - x_w)\tan \beta = h - y_b \iff (\ddot x_b - \ddot x_w)\tan \beta = -\ddot y_b##

Since ##\beta = \theta = 45^\circ##, ##\tan \beta = 1##.

##\ddot x_b - \ddot x_w = -\ddot y_b##.
Oh, ok.
Very sorry, but because I engage in many threads at once I sometimes forget some crucial fact about a problem. In this case I forgot you had already explained θ is 45°. So now I agree with all your equations and can only apologise for all the noise.

Moving on to your original question:
Buffu said:
since the block is moving downward , ##mg -N\cos \theta ## feels more natural and correct
You have defined y as positive upwards, so ##\ddot y## is positive upwards. In the equation ##\Sigma F_y=m\ddot y##, the forces must also be written as positive upwards, so ##N\cos \theta-mg ##.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
Oh, ok.
Very sorry, but because I engage in many threads at once I sometimes forget some crucial fact about a problem. In this case I forgot you had already explained θ is 45°. So now I agree with all your equations and can only apologise for all the noise.

Moving on to your original question:

You have defined y as positive upwards, so ##\ddot y## is positive upwards. In the equation ##\Sigma F_y=m\ddot y##, the forces must also be written as positive upwards, so ##N\cos \theta-mg ##.

Oh, right, that was basic. I thought I was missing something very basic. lol.
 
Back
Top