Sign of voltage across inductor

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the sign of the voltage across an inductor in a circuit where a current source is providing current to a resistor in series with the inductor. The original poster is specifically trying to determine the sign of the voltage V2 at the inductor/resistor point when the current is ramped up.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Lenz's law to explain the behavior of the voltage across the inductor as the current increases, questioning the implications of the induced emf direction.
  • Some participants question the interpretation of the voltage sign and the relationship between the current and the induced electric field, exploring the potential implications of the electric field direction.
  • Others suggest reconsidering the assumptions about the voltage polarity and the relationship between the current flow and the induced emf.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the voltage sign and the underlying principles. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the emf and the current direction, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct interpretation yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of electromagnetic theory, particularly how Lenz's law applies to the situation described. There is an acknowledgment of potential sign errors in reasoning, but no resolution has been reached regarding the assumptions or definitions involved.

ElectroWhat
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I need help understanding the sign of voltages across an inductor.

Homework Statement



There is a current source providing current I to a resitor of resistance R in series with an inductor of inductance L, of which the other end is grounded. The voltage at the current source is V1 and the voltage at the inductor/resistor point is V2.

Explain the sign of V2 if the current is ramped up.

Homework Equations



I know from Lenz's law that
Emf = - d Bflux / dt = - L dI/dt.

The Attempt at a Solution



From Lenz's law, if the current is increasing, an Emf will be created in the opposite direction of the current increase. So the Emf will be pointing from ground to the V2 point. So the voltage will be increasing from V2 to ground ... so the voltage is NEGATIVE?

But that doesn't make any sense. Here's what I'm having trouble with:

This would mean the current is not only flowing AGAINST the Emf, but actually increasing against it.

What am I doing wrong?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Syed Lateef
Physics news on Phys.org
"So the Emf will be pointing from ground to the V2 point. "
Right.

"So the voltage will be increasing from V2 to ground ... so the voltage is NEGATIVE?"

No, why do you think so? Assuming that the current flows through the resistor towards the inductor, (see pic) the negative emf means a voltage source which opposes this current, that is, positive pole at the resistor/inductor point with respect to the ground: V2 is positive.

ehild
 
Last edited:
I can't see your attachment. It says "pending approval" on my end.
ehild said:
"So the Emf will be pointing from ground to the V2 point. "
Right.
If the force is pointing from ground to the V2 point, then the current is flowing against the force. No?

One of Maxwell's equations is:
\nabla \times \vec{E} = - \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \vec{B}
Using stoke's theorem this gives:
\oint_{\partial S} \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = - \frac {\partial}{\partial t} \int_S \vec{B}\cdot d\vec{a}

So the change in current will create a change in magnetic field, which will create an electric field against the change in current.

It really does appear that the electric field is pointing from ground to the V2 point, and the current is flowing against the electric field. How is this possible?

And if the electric field is pointing from ground to the V2 point, which means going from ground to V2 is going down in potential, then V2 must have a lower potential than ground. V2 is therefore negative.

Something is wrong here, but I can't find the problem with the logic.
 
Last edited:
The voltage across an inductor is:
V = L \frac{dI}{dt}

The question only gives you enough details to get the sign of the voltage, but that is all you wanted anyway.

Or are you asking how to derive that from Lenz's law?

Hmm... I'm not good at tracking down sign errors. I don't really see what you've done wrong there. Sorry. All I can verify is that it is indeed wrong as you suspect.

Hopefully someone else can see what is wrong and lead you through it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
999
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K