Signal Processing Help: 3rd + 1st Order Nonlinear Device Multiplier

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using a third and first order nonlinear device to create a multiplier, with the user struggling to derive the necessary terms from their equation. They correctly expand the expression but find that none of the resulting terms include the desired m(t)cos(wt) product. The user questions what should be filtered out and considers the relationship between the frequencies fo and fc. After consulting with a teaching assistant, they confirm that fo can be set to 2fc, which provides a starting point for solving the problem. The conversation highlights the complexities of nonlinear signal processing in this context.
Miscing
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://i.imgur.com/01AUp.png





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Having some problems with this question, using a third + first order nonlinear device to make a multiplier. I'm fine with using a second order, but this one is stumping me. So, I take x(t) = m(t) + cos(wt) and plug it into x(t) + (x(t))^3 , and I get (expanding cos(wt)2 and cos(wt)3 terms:

5/2* m + cos(wt) + m^3 + 3* m^2* cos(wt) +3/2m cos(2wt) + 3/4* cos(wt) + 1/4* cos(3wt).

Problem: None of the terms contain m(t)cos(wt)! Then what am I supposed to filter out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I might be wrong here, but ... looking for clues, I notice they speak of fo and fc ...

I wonder can fc = 2·fo?
 
Thanks, after emailing the TA he confirmed that indeed fo is arbitrary here, and so fo = 2fc is the way to start answering this.
 
Back
Top