Signal strength of a wave packet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the signal strength of a wave packet defined by contributions from various frequencies. The signal strength as a function of time, V(t), is derived using the integral of the wave packet's frequency contributions, resulting in a specific expression involving sine functions. Participants discuss the sketches of g(ω) and V(t), clarifying the limits of integration and addressing uncertainties about the definitions of Δω and Δt in the context of the plots. The standard deviation approach is suggested for calculating Δt, while confirming the correct limits for the integral is emphasized. Overall, the conversation centers on accurately representing the mathematical relationships and properties of wave packets.
Elvis 123456789
Messages
158
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Assume a wave packet is has contributions from various frequencies, give by g(ω)=C for |ω|<ω0, and g(ω) =0 for elsewhere.

a)What is the signal strength as a function of time, i.e., V(t)=?

b) Sketch g(ω) and V(t); You can use fooplots.com, for example, or python.

c) Indicate Δω and Δt in the above plots; Does the products of these two satisfy ΔωΔt>1/2?

Homework Equations


V(t) = 1/√(2π) * integral from -∞ to +∞ of [ g(ω)*exp(iωt)] dω

exp(iωt) = cos(ωt) + isin(ωt)

The Attempt at a Solution



a.) V(t) = 1/√(2π) * integral from -ω0 to +ω0 of [ C*exp(iωt)] dω

using eulers formula and the properties of even and odd functions

V(t) = 2/√(2π) * integral from 0 to +ω0 of [ C*cos(ωt)] dω

V(t) = 2C/√(2π) * sin(ω0t)/t = √(2/π)*ω0C * sin(ω0t)/ω0t

b.) the sketches for g(ω) and V(t) are in the attachments

c.) I am not really sure what Δω and Δt in these graphs
 

Attachments

  • phy graph.jpg
    phy graph.jpg
    29.4 KB · Views: 495
  • phy graph 2.jpg
    phy graph 2.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 479
  • signal strength vs time.png
    signal strength vs time.png
    11.1 KB · Views: 582
Physics news on Phys.org
Elvis 123456789 said:
V(t) = 2/√(2π) * integral from 0 to +ω0 of [ C*cos(ωt)] dω
Shouldn't the lower integral limit be ##-\omega_0##?
Elvis 123456789 said:
c.) I am not really sure what Δω and Δt in these graphs
Use the definition of standard deviation. For example for V(t), you will use
$$
\Delta t = \sqrt{E[t^2]-(E[t])^2}
$$
where ##E[\,\,]## means taking average over the intensity ##|V(t)|^2##. Similar arguments for ##g(\omega)##.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Shouldn't the lower integral limit be −ω0−ω0-\omega_0?
I have a factor of 2 in the front to account for that. Is that not right?
 
Elvis 123456789 said:
I have a factor of 2 in the front to account for that. Is that not right?
Ah sorry I missed that, you are right.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top