Signals & Systems - Laplace - Oscillatory Component

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the conditions under which the output y(t) of a system contains an oscillatory component, specifically analyzing the transfer function H(s) = R/(R + sL). It is established that for y(t) to exhibit oscillatory behavior, the denominator must contain a complex component, which occurs if R is complex. The participants explore the implications of R being greater than 1/L, concluding that if R is real and greater than 1/L, the system will not have oscillatory behavior. They also discuss the relevance of Laplace transforms and the conditions for oscillation, emphasizing the need for complex roots in the system's characteristic equation. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between system parameters and oscillatory response.
Angello90
Messages
65
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is that oscillatory component? And is my answer for the following correct?

x(t) = u(t)
H(s) = \frac{R}{R + sL}

y(t) will contain oscillatory component if
R > \frac{1}{L}
True or False?

Homework Equations


Basic Laplace Transform:
u(t) \longrightarrow \frac{1}{s}
e^{-at}u(t) \longrightarrow \frac{1}{s+a}


The Attempt at a Solution


H(s) = \frac{\frac{R}{L}}{s + \frac{R}{L}}
X(s) = \frac{1}{s}
Y(s) = \frac{1}{s} * \frac{\frac{R}{L}}{s + \frac{R}{L}}
where * donates multiplication not convolution.

Doing partial fraction expansion I got:
Y(s) = \frac{1}{s} - \frac{1}{s + \frac{R}{L}}
which in time domain is:
y(t) = u(t) - e^{\frac{-Rt}{L}}u(t)

Now, clearly, if:
R > \frac{1}{L}
that exponential e will converge to 0, and signal would eventually be a DC signal - 1 which is donated by u(t) right? So output y(t) doesn't have an oscillatory component?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Euler's identity is e^{ix} = \cos(x) + i\sin(x) Add this to your list of relevant equations and the answer should be clear.
 
viscousflow I don't really see how I could use this. I assume I need to change
e^{\frac{-Rt}{L}}u(t)
But I don't know how, cause I don't have i. Should I take one i outside?
e^{\frac{i.i.Rt}{L}}u(t)
Than I would end up with:
e^{\frac{i.i.Rt}{L}}u(t) = (Cosh(\frac{Rt}{L}) - Sinh(\frac{Rt}{L}))u(t)
Am I going in right direction?
 
What it boils down to is, for any first order system to be oscillatory, your denominator needs to have a complex number. Therefore, it needs to be of the form s + (a+bi)
 
Ok, so should I do the partial fraction expansion as I did and work on:
Y(s) = \frac{1}{s} - \frac{1}{s + \frac{R}{L}}
or start over? Or... there is no complex component in dominator, therefore there is no oscillatory component?

Sorry for being annoying.
 
No, all you need to do is perform the substitution in your second equation under "Relevant equations"

<br /> e^{-at}u(t) \longrightarrow \frac{1}{s+a}<br />

where a = b+ci

You need to divide top and bottom by R
 
But isn't this rather wierd? I would get
Y(s) = \frac{1}{s} - \frac{\frac{1}{R}}{\frac{s}{R} + \frac{1}{L}}
and than I should transform from Laplace to time domain?
 
Seems as though you made it a bit complicated. Let me help you out a bit.

<br /> H(s) = \frac{R}{R + sL}<br />

Divide by R

Y(s) = \frac{1}{ s(\frac{L}{R}s + 1)} or Y(s) =\frac{1}{ s(s + \frac{R}{L})}

your roots are
s=0; s= -\frac{R}{L}

Thus, R can be complex and L can be real.
 
Ok I found this extract in the book that my department is using for signals and systems, saying that,
Assuming that we have:
\frac{A_{1}}{s-\alpha - j\omega_{0}} + \frac{A_{2}}{s-\alpha + j\omega_{0}}
can be replaces by:
\frac{B_{1}s + B_{2}}{(s-\alpha - j\omega_{0})((s-\alpha + j\omega_{0})}
and simplifying:
\frac{B_{1}s + B_{2}}{(s-\alpha)^{2} + \omega_{0}^{2}}

And there is a transition one can use:
e^{at}cos(\omega_{0}t) \longleftrightarrow \frac{(s-\alpha)}{(s-\alpha)^{2} + \omega_{0}^{2}}
and
e^{at}sin(\omega_{0}t) \longleftrightarrow \frac{\omega_{0}}{(s-\alpha)^{2} + \omega_{0}^{2}}

can these transitions be used?
 
  • #10
Hold on, so by saying that s=0, s=-R/L, and assuming that R is and imaginary number and L is real, that eqn has a oscillatory component? My lecture never covered that part of the course, yet he examines on this .

Will this hold the fact that R>1/L? Can imaginary number be greater than rational number?
 
Back
Top