Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point

AI Thread Summary
When determining how to express the number 30 with an uncertainty of 0.0625, it is important to consider significant figures and rounding. The uncertainty introduces a precision that suggests writing the number as 30.000 ± 0.0625, but there are factors that may affect this. Errors can arise from rounding to the nearest mark on the ruler, placement inaccuracies, and the decision on the nearest mark. A suggested approach is to round the uncertainty slightly to ±0.07 or even to ±0.08 for clarity. Ultimately, the expression should reflect both the measurement and the associated uncertainties accurately.
vvfrn3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point
To what decimal point do I write the number 30 if the uncertainty is 0.0625?
The ruler has 1/8 marks.

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vvfrn3 said:
Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point
To what decimal point do I write the number 30 if the uncertainty is 0.0625?
The ruler has 1/8 marks.

Thank you :)

Welcome to the PF.

You are required to show your Attempt at a Solution before we can offer any tutorial help. How would *you* approach this problem?
 
I thought it would be 30.000 +- 0.0625 bc there are 3 sig figs in the uncertainty, but I'm not sure. :/
Also, should the uncertainty be rounded since it looks very precise? I'm so sonfused
 
vvfrn3 said:
I thought it would be 30.000 +- 0.0625 bc there are 3 sig figs in the uncertainty, but I'm not sure. :/
Also, should the uncertainty be rounded since it looks very precise? I'm so confused
There are three sources of error here. One is that you are rounding to the nearest mark. That introduces an uncertainty of exactly ±0.0625. Next is any error in the placing of the marks on the ruler. You could handle that by rounding the first uncertainty up a little, ±0.064, say. Third is any error in your decision of which is the nearest mark. That's the same in nature as the second error, but statistically independent.
Now, suppose you decide the error is ±0.07 and you measured the value as 30.375. It would be quite appropriate to write the answer as, say, 30.375±0.070, strange though that may seem. But it would also be reasonable to compromise there, e.g. with 30.37±0.08.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top