Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point

AI Thread Summary
When determining how to express the number 30 with an uncertainty of 0.0625, it is important to consider significant figures and rounding. The uncertainty introduces a precision that suggests writing the number as 30.000 ± 0.0625, but there are factors that may affect this. Errors can arise from rounding to the nearest mark on the ruler, placement inaccuracies, and the decision on the nearest mark. A suggested approach is to round the uncertainty slightly to ±0.07 or even to ±0.08 for clarity. Ultimately, the expression should reflect both the measurement and the associated uncertainties accurately.
vvfrn3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point
To what decimal point do I write the number 30 if the uncertainty is 0.0625?
The ruler has 1/8 marks.

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vvfrn3 said:
Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point
To what decimal point do I write the number 30 if the uncertainty is 0.0625?
The ruler has 1/8 marks.

Thank you :)

Welcome to the PF.

You are required to show your Attempt at a Solution before we can offer any tutorial help. How would *you* approach this problem?
 
I thought it would be 30.000 +- 0.0625 bc there are 3 sig figs in the uncertainty, but I'm not sure. :/
Also, should the uncertainty be rounded since it looks very precise? I'm so sonfused
 
vvfrn3 said:
I thought it would be 30.000 +- 0.0625 bc there are 3 sig figs in the uncertainty, but I'm not sure. :/
Also, should the uncertainty be rounded since it looks very precise? I'm so confused
There are three sources of error here. One is that you are rounding to the nearest mark. That introduces an uncertainty of exactly ±0.0625. Next is any error in the placing of the marks on the ruler. You could handle that by rounding the first uncertainty up a little, ±0.064, say. Third is any error in your decision of which is the nearest mark. That's the same in nature as the second error, but statistically independent.
Now, suppose you decide the error is ±0.07 and you measured the value as 30.375. It would be quite appropriate to write the answer as, say, 30.375±0.070, strange though that may seem. But it would also be reasonable to compromise there, e.g. with 30.37±0.08.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top