Signs of Tensile and Compressive Stresses

  • Thread starter Thread starter a1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensile
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conventions of axial tensile and compressive stresses in free body diagrams (FBDs) and how to correctly assign signs to forces and stresses based on their directions. Participants explore the implications of these conventions on the calculation of axial forces and stresses.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that axial tensile stresses are conventionally positive while axial compressive stresses are negative, leading to confusion in their FBDs.
  • The same participant questions how to reconcile the sign of the force with the sign of the stress, particularly when the calculated force indicates compression but the stress convention suggests otherwise.
  • Another participant explains that the sign of a force in an FBD should not be assigned until the direction is confirmed, suggesting that if a force is directed inward, it is compressive and should be treated as negative, while outward forces are tensile and treated as positive.
  • This participant emphasizes that the assignment of signs should occur after determining the nature of the force, rather than assuming signs from the outset.
  • A later reply acknowledges the explanation and reflects on the misunderstanding regarding the relationship between force signs and stress signs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express some agreement on the conventions of assigning signs to tensile and compressive forces, but there remains uncertainty about how these conventions apply in practice, particularly in relation to FBDs and the calculation of stresses.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of consensus on the best approach to assigning signs in FBDs, particularly when dealing with forces at angles or when transitioning from forces to stresses. Participants highlight the complexity of these conventions and their implications for calculations.

a1234
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
Signs (directions) of forces on FBDs are not matching up with the conventions used for tensile and compressive stresses
I have recently learned that, by convention, axial tensile stresses are positive and axial compressive stresses are negative. I am having some trouble incorporating this information into my FBDs that are used to find the axial forces leading to these stresses.

For instance, from the attached FBD, I ended up finding Fab to be -500 N, which indicates that the force is actually compressive (directed toward point A) and not tensile as drawn in the FBD. However, if I had originally drawn Fab to be in compression, then wouldn't I find Fab = +500 N?

If I had drawn the latter kind of FBD and used Fab = +500 N to find the axial stress in Fab, I would end up with a positive value for the stress, which I know is wrong because the stress is compressive. In this case, how can I make the stress a negative value?

Could someone please help me figure out what I am missing here?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • FBD of Point.PNG
    FBD of Point.PNG
    891 bytes · Views: 421
Engineering news on Phys.org
a1234 said:
Summary: Signs (directions) of forces on FBDs are not matching up with the conventions used for tensile and compressive stresses

I have recently learned that, by convention, axial tensile stresses are positive and axial compressive stresses are negative. I am having some trouble incorporating this information into my FBDs that are used to find the axial forces leading to these stresses.

For instance, from the attached FBD, I ended up finding Fab to be -500 N, which indicates that the force is actually compressive (directed toward point A) and not tensile as drawn in the FBD. However, if I had originally drawn Fab to be in compression, then wouldn't I find Fab = +500 N?

If I had drawn the latter kind of FBD and used Fab = +500 N to find the axial stress in Fab, I would end up with a positive value for the stress, which I know is wrong because the stress is compressive. In this case, how can I make the stress a negative value?

Could someone please help me figure out what I am missing here?

Thanks!
The plus and minus signs have multiple meanings in Physics and Engineering. Similar perhaps to your example, if you assume that a force acts down and you get a negative solution for that force, it means that you assumed the wrong direction for the force, and that it actually acts up. If you got a positive solution for that force, it means you assumed the correct direction for that force, even though it may be a compressive force.

Forget about actual signage for tension and compressive axial forces in a free body diagram...I mean how do you assign a positive or negative values to a force acting at a 45 degree angle?

The rule is this: if the force points inward toward the joint or member, it is a compressive force. If it points outward away from the joint or member, it is a tensile force. For the compression case , you call it a negative force, for the tension case, you call it a positive force, by convention. So don’t give it a sign until the end. If you assumed the direction of all forces correctly up front, you are going to get all positive numbers. Only after you determine if it is a pushing force or pulling force can you then give it a sign. Or don’t give it a sign, just say for sample that ‘the force is 10 N compressive’.
 
Thanks for the explanation. This makes a lot of sense.

Somehow, I assumed that the signs were supposed to "carry over" to the stresses in compression and tension, and I didn't think of them as having separate meanings.
 
You are welcome. Yeah, the minus sign is always a killer...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K