Silly Squeeze Theorem Question lim (cos(x))

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
10 replies · 4K views
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Hoowwwwdddyyyyyy!

I am reviewing some Calculus and was going over the Sandwich Theorem. It's delicious.

An example that they give is: From the definition of cos[itex]\theta[/itex], [itex]0\le 1-\cos\theta\le |\theta|[/itex] for all theta. and we have

[tex]\lim_{\theta\rightarrow 0}(1-\cos\theta)=0[/tex] or

[tex]\lim_{\theta\rightarrow 0}\cos\theta = 1[/tex]

I am having trouble seeing the transition in the last two steps. How does

[tex]\lim_{\theta\rightarrow 0}(1-\cos\theta)=0 \Rightarrow<br /> <br /> \lim_{\theta\rightarrow 0}\cos\theta = 1[/tex] ?

Thanks! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex] \lim_{\theta\rightarrow 0}(1-\cos\theta)= \lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} 1 - \lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} cos\theta[/tex] and since [tex]\lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} (1 - cos\theta) = 0[/tex], we have [tex]\lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} cos\theta = \lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} 1 = 1[/tex]
 
JG89 said:
[tex] \lim_{\theta\rightarrow 0}(1-\cos\theta)= \lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} 1 - \lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} cos\theta[/tex] and since [tex]\lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} (1 - cos\theta) = 0[/tex], we have [tex]\lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} cos\theta = \lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} 1 = 1[/tex]

Awwww man! Oldest trick in the book! Can't believe I didn't see that! Thanks JG89! :smile:
 
Here's another way to look at it:

If [tex]\lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} (1 - cos\theta) = 0[/tex] then for all positive epsilon there exists a positive delta such that [tex]|1 - cos\theta| < \epsilon[/tex] whenever [tex]|\theta| < \delta[/tex].

Note that [tex]|1 - cos\theta| = |(1 - cos\theta) - 0| < \epsilon[/tex]. So this statement says that for theta approaching 0, [tex]1 - cos\theta[/tex] goes to 0, or since |1 - cos(theta) - 0| = |1 - cos(theta)|, that cos(theta) goes to 1.
 
If [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x) = L[/tex] and [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} g(x) = M[/tex], then [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} (f + g)(x) = L + M[/tex]. It is then a simple corollary that [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x) = L[/tex] if and only if [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a}(f(x) - L) = 0[/tex]. (The same theorem is used to prove both ways; apply it creatively).
 
JG89 said:
[tex] \lim_{\theta\rightarrow 0}(1-\cos\theta)= \lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} 1 - \lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} cos\theta[/tex] and since [tex]\lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} (1 - cos\theta) = 0[/tex], we have [tex]\lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} cos\theta = \lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} 1 = 1[/tex]

Note that the passage from the first equation to the second is only valid in if you already know that the [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \cos x[/tex] exists, something you would have to argue or show separately.
 
Well if the limit as x approaches 0 of 1 - cos(x) exists, something which is being assumed in the OP's question, of course the limit of cos(x) exists.
 
JG89 said:
Well if the limit as x approaches 0 of 1 - cos(x) exists, something which is being assumed in the OP's question, of course the limit of cos(x) exists.

This is not true! Consider f(x) to be -1 for x in (-oo, 0) and 1 for x in [0, oo) and let g(x) be 1 for x in (-oo, 0] and -1 for x in (0, oo). Then as x approaches 0, (f + g)(x) approaches 0 as well, but individually the limits of f and g do not even exist at 0!
To bridge the step in your theorem, you must either know or prove beforehand that cos(x) is continuous at 0 or that it at least has a limit there.
 
I stand corrected. Thanks for the counter example!
 
Though in my defense, if for every positive epsilon there exists a positive delta such that [tex]|1 - cosx| < \epsilon[/tex] whenever [tex]|x| < \delta[/tex], then since cos(0) = 1, then we have [tex]|1 - cosx| = | cos0 - cosx| < \epsilon[/tex] if [tex]|x| < \delta[/tex], which means cos(x) is continuous at x = 0, so it must possesses a limit there.
 
JG89 said:
Though in my defense, if for every positive epsilon there exists a positive delta such that [tex]|1 - cosx| < \epsilon[/tex] whenever [tex]|x| < \delta[/tex], then since cos(0) = 1, then we have [tex]|1 - cosx| = | cos0 - cosx| < \epsilon[/tex] if [tex]|x| < \delta[/tex], which means cos(x) is continuous at x = 0, so it must possesses a limit there.

Nice argument!