Solving for Electron Acceleration and Time in a Television Tube - Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter elimenohpee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
In a television tube, electrons accelerate from rest to a speed of 2 x 10^8 m/s over a distance of 1.50 cm. The calculated acceleration is approximately 1.3 x 10^18 m/s², which raises concerns about exceeding the speed of light according to relativity. The time taken for this acceleration is estimated at 1.5 x 10^-10 seconds. While the calculations align with Newtonian physics, the high speed suggests that relativistic effects should be considered. However, since this is an introductory course, the focus remains on Newtonian principles, and the calculations are deemed reasonable within that context.
elimenohpee
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a television tube, electrons travel down the tube and strike the fluorescent material at
the end of the tube. Their impact with this material causes light to be emitted, thereby producing
the picture we see. The electrons are accelerated from rest to a speed of 2 x 108 ms-1 in a distance
of 1.50 cm.
(i) What is the acceleration of an electron during this process? (10 marks)
(ii) How long does the acceleration take?


Homework Equations


(i) the acceleration I calculated seems WAY too large. I know the acceleration will be big, but I didn't think it could exceed the speed of light due to the theory of relativity.

(ii) the time to accelerate makes sense, but I think its wrong because I calculated the acceleration wrong.

The Attempt at a Solution



(i) I used the equation that doesn't involve time, only velocity, initial velocity, position and time:
v^2 = v^2(0) + 2a (x - x0)
(2*10^8)^2 = 0 + 2a (0.015m - 0)
a = 1.3 * 10^18 ?

(ii) with a = 1.3 * 10^18, I just plugged it into x = 0.5a(t^2), solved for t and got t = 1.5 * 10^-10 s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Extremely large accelerations do happen in these tubes.
But the speed given in the question - more than half the speed of light - indicates you should be using relativity formulas instead of Newtonian ones.

Can you teach me how to do this?
If you aren't in a relativity class, maybe you aren't supposed to worry about relativity.
 
Its not in a relativity class, its just an introductory course to Newtonian physics. I know we aren't supposed to know about relativity at this point, but that acceleration just didn't make sense to me. Can anyone verify if this is right?
 
I haven't gone through all the calculator work, but it certainly appears to be correct and the acceleration is reasonable. In a non-relativity course, you have it done correctly.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top