Simple Acceleration-Distance runner problem doesn't self-check

  • Thread starter Thread starter Head_Unit
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a runner's acceleration over the last 200 meters of a race. The initial calculations suggest that the runner takes 20 seconds to cover the distance, but the distance equation yields only 160 meters instead of the required 200 meters. Participants highlight the ambiguity in the problem statement regarding when the runner begins to accelerate, leading to different interpretations and solutions. One interpretation suggests the runner accelerates at some point within the last 200 meters, while another implies she accelerates from the start of that segment. Clarification on the problem's wording is recommended to resolve the confusion.
Head_Unit
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
Hi Folks: I am puzzled by this problem; there must be something wrong but I can't see what...

1. The problem statement: "A runner enters the last 200 m of a race running 6 m/s. She accelerates at 0.2 m/s2 &crosses the finish line at 10 m/s. What is her time for the last 200 m?"

2. Homework Equations : "(HINT: use V-V0=a*t to find time. Then use X = Vo*t + 0.5*a*t^2 to get t)."


The Attempt at a Solution

:
V-V0=a*t --> 10-6=0.2*t --> 4=0.2*t --> t=4÷0.2=20s.
That self-checks: V-V0=a*t --> V-6=0.2*20 --> V=4+6=10m/s

But the second part is more problematic. X is the distance; I plug in the 20s from the first equation.

X = Vo*t + 0.5*a*t^2[/B]
X = 6*20 +0.5*0.2*(20^2)
X = 120+0.01*400 = 120+40 = 160...instead of 200 as it should be!

It's also possible to put X=200 from the problem, and solve a quadratic for t, but that is a big pain in the rear. Anyway, I am really wondering what silly step I am missing that part 2 gives me 160 instead of 200??!

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Head_Unit said:
Hi Folks: I am puzzled by this problem; there must be something wrong but I can't see what...

1. The problem statement: "A runner enters the last 200 m of a race running 6 m/s. She accelerates at 0.2 m/s2 &crosses the finish line at 10 m/s. What is her time for the last 200 m?"

2. Homework Equations : "(HINT: use V-V0=a*t to find time. Then use X = Vo*t + 0.5*a*t^2 to get t)."


The Attempt at a Solution

:
V-V0=a*t --> 10-6=0.2*t --> 4=0.2*t --> t=4÷0.2=20s.
That self-checks: V-V0=a*t --> V-6=0.2*20 --> V=4+6=10m/s

But the second part is more problematic. X is the distance; I plug in the 20s from the first equation.

X = Vo*t + 0.5*a*t^2
X = 6*20 +0.5*0.2*(20^2)
X = 120+0.01*400 = 120+40 = 160...instead of 200 as it should be!

It's also possible to put X=200 from the problem, and solve a quadratic for t, but that is a big pain in the rear. Anyway, I am really wondering what silly step I am missing that part 2 gives me 160 instead of 200??!
[/B]
The question, as it was written above, is a little vague. If you assume that she starts accelerating at 200 m before the finish line, and continues accelerating until she crosses the finish, the math does not work out and she will cross the finish line at a speed faster than 10 m/s.

One way to interpret the problem such that things work out is that she starts accelerating at some point within the last 200 m of the race, but not necessarily at exactly 200 m before the finish line. If so, the problem statement would be interpreted as, "A runner enters the last 200 m of a race running 6 m/s. At some point within that last 200 m, she accelerates at 0.2 m/s2 and continues accelerating until the finish such that she crosses the finish line at 10 m/s.

On the other hand, it's also possible to interpret the problem such that she starts accelerating at the point 200 m before the finish line, and stops accelerating when she reaches 10 m/s, and finishes the remainder of the distance at a constant 10 m/s. That will lead to a different answer than above. And if that's the case, the problem statement would read, "A runner enters the last 200 m of a race running 6 m/s, at which point she accelerates at 0.2 m/s2 until she reaches a speed of 10 m/s. She continues at that speed until she crosses the finish line."

I don't know which is the correct way to interpret the problem. Perhaps you can solve it both ways and ask your instructor which is the correct interpretation.
 
Ah, I get it now, thanks. The acceleration was calculated from the velocity change, but the "200 m" stuck on as a fact…but not really calculated. So probably this would be self-consistent if the acceleration was 0.1 m/s^2 or such.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top