Acceleration Problem: Solving for Constant Acceleration with Kinematic Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter nordqvist11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding displacement and acceleration in kinematic equations, particularly in the context of a car slowing down from 23 m/s to rest over 85 m. The original poster expresses confusion about determining the direction of displacement and acceleration when not specified in the problem. They calculated the acceleration as -3.1 m/s², which is correct, as it indicates deceleration opposite to the initial velocity direction. Clarification is provided that the acceleration must be negative due to the car's slowing down. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector directions in kinematics.
nordqvist11
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'd just like someone to see if I answered correctly. I'm having a bit of difficulty grasping the vagueness of the displacement in these questions I've been getting in my textbook. From what I gather the displacement is relative to the vector points, (the two x points in kinematic equations). However, how am I to know what direction the car is traveling relative to the x plane if it doesn't specify the point in a question? I don't know if you guys get me.. The acceleration I found in the question below, could be positive or negative, it doesn't specify enough. Or am I wrong?

A car slows down from 23 m/s to rest in a distance of 85 m. What was its acceleration, assumed constant?

Homework Equations



The kinematic equations for constant acceleration.

I attempted to solve it with the following:

finalV^2=initialV^2+2a(finalX-initialX)

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is an image of my attempted work. I got -3.1 m/s^2 as my answer.
Physics_problem_solution.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Good work by you! :smile:
 
Yes! Thanks
 
The acceleration I found in the question below, could be positive or negative, it doesn't specify enough. Or am I wrong?

A car slows down from 23 m/s to rest in a distance of 85 m. What was its acceleration, assumed constant?

Sorry, I did not read your question carefully enough.

V0x = +23m/s (assumedly in the +x direction)
x0 = 0
x = 85

Since the car is decelerating, the acceleration vector will be in the opposite direction of the velocity vector, hence the appropriateness of the "-" in front of 3.1m/s2
 
Very helpful, thank you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top