Simple and pedantic question about a problem involving q=it

  • Thread starter Thread starter s3a
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the equation q = i × t, specifically regarding the notation q(0-) = 0. Participants clarify that this notation indicates the charge q is assumed to be zero immediately before t=0, suggesting a continuity requirement in physical systems. The focus on the immediate moment before t=0 rather than earlier moments is explained as a simplification to avoid complications in the equation. It is concluded that assuming q=0 prior to the time interval allows for a cleaner analysis without needing to account for prior charge values. This understanding helps clarify the underlying assumptions in the problem's solution.
s3a
Messages
814
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


The problem and solution are attached as TheProblemAndSolution.jpeg.

Homework Equations


q = i × t

The Attempt at a Solution


For part (b), I just wanted to ask:
What does q(o-) = 0 (which is at the bottom of the solution) mean? Is the author trying to say ##q(0^{-}) = 0## in the sense that he or she is trying to say that he or she is assuming that q = 0 for any t < 0?

Any input would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • TheProblemAndSolution.jpeg
    TheProblemAndSolution.jpeg
    37.6 KB · Views: 496
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it means, more generally, that q=0 immediately before t=0. Thus it is realistic that at t=0, q=0.
What would happen if q>0 immediately preceding the time interval? You might need something like q(t) = q_0 + it.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thanks for the response.

Why did the author focus only on the immediate moment before t = 0 instead of any moment before t = 0, though?

Is there some kind of significance to ignoring values less than t = 0 that aren't the immediate moment before t = 0?
 
Last edited:
I think it may have to do with some continuity requirement.
 
Even if you're not 100% sure, could you please be more specific as to what you're thinking? Perhaps what you're thinking could be just what I need to get the epiphany I'm looking for.
 
As with most things, q = i*t is likely a simplification of something like q(t) = q_0+ i*t. The i*t piece is clearly 0 at t=0, and most physical systems require continuity. To that end, it doesn't matter what the system was doing in negative time, as long as it was zeroed out before this time interval started. If there were a charge present at t=0-, then some of that charge would be carried into the time interval we are interested in.
 
So, that assumption is just used to ignore and not have to use a y-intercept, in order to simplify the equation?
 
Yes.
 
Okay, I get it now. :)

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top