Simple complex number question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the vertex z3 of a rhombus formed by the complex numbers z1z2, z1/z2, and the origin. There is confusion about whether the sum of z1z2 and z1/z2 gives z3 or a diagonal. A simpler example with vertices at (0, 0), (1, 0), and (0, i) is used to illustrate the concept of finding the opposite corner in a quadrilateral. Participants clarify that the method applies to Argand diagrams and emphasizes the relationship between the points as vectors. The conversation concludes with the understanding that the sum of the two points provides the position vector for the opposite corner.
synkk
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
z_1z_2 = -1 + 2i
\frac{z_1}{z_2} = \frac{11}{5} + \frac{2}{5}i

Given that the origin, z1z2, z1/z2 and z3 are vertices of a rhombus, find z3.

I've drawn a sketch on a Argand diagram and the sketch is fine, but to find z3, they have done z1z2 + z1/z2 , but would this not give you a diagonal which joins z1z2 and z1/z2 instead of z3? How would it give you z3, if anyone could explain
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it wouldn't give you the diagonal joining ##z_1z_2## and ##z_1/z_2##.

Consider a simpler case where the vertices are at (0, 0), (1, 0), and (0, i). Where would the other corner of the square lie and how are its coordinates related to (1, 0) and (0, i)?
 
vela said:
No, it wouldn't give you the diagonal joining ##z_1z_2## and ##z_1/z_2##.

Consider a simpler case where the vertices are at (0, 0), (1, 0), and (0, i). Where would the other corner of the square lie and how are its coordinates related to (1, 0) and (0, i)?

I see.

Does this only work on Argand diagrams and quadrilaterals?
 
I would think of the two given points as vectors. If z1z2 is one side, and z1/z2 is another, then their sum gives the position vector of the opposite corner.
 
Back
Top