Is 0.132 Hartrees/Bohr^2 Correctly Converted to J/m^2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The conversion of 0.132 Hartrees/Bohr^2 to J/m^2 involves multiplying by 4.36 x 10^(-18) J/Hartree and dividing by (5.29 x 10^(-11))^2 m^2/Bohr^2. After performing the calculations, the result is approximately 205.7 J/m^2. The initial uncertainty about the conversion process was addressed, confirming the method used. Overall, the conversion appears to be correct based on the provided calculations.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Can someone please confirm whether I've done the following conversion correctly?

What does 0.132 Hartrees/Bohr^2 convert to in units of J/m^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not knowing what you did we can't say if you did it right.
 
Borek said:
Not knowing what you did we can't say if you did it right.

Ugh. You're right...I can't believe I forgot to post that.

I took 0.132 and multiplied by 4.36 x 10^(-18) J/Hartree, then divided by (5.29 x 10^(-11))^2 m^2/Bohr^2. This gives me something like 205.7 J/m^2.
 
Looks OK to me.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top